so people won t circulating in the community the way they are now, so there community the way they are now, so there is community the way they are now, so there is this community the way they are now, so there is this issue of everybody returning there is this issue of everybody returning to daily life in the normal returning to daily life in the normal way and trying to live with coronavirus normal way and trying to live with coronavirus with this kind of added flu that coronavirus with this kind of added flu that normally exists anyway at this time flu that normally exists anyway at this time of year. doctor harries made this time of year. doctor harries made an this time of year. doctor harries made an interesting point in the piece made an interesting point in the piece about the fact that flu is quite piece about the fact that flu is quite a piece about the fact that flu is quite a serious condition and we often quite a serious condition and we often think
it s really concerning the story. i supposed to some extent it might be an indication that things might be going back to normalfor ill or good. because the problem of abuse and in the health service is not a new one on though it might have abated in the period of time where so that people were so grateful to health workers, but, yes, this is very concerning and probably is a problem that is not going away any time soon because there are all sorts of warnings about staff shortfalls, notjust nurses, so it s problem that there are practical measures that can reduce the problems for nurses who have worked so hard without much break at all as coronavirus was sweeping the country, getting on for two years
running a campaign to get people to go back to the office but the warning that it you come down with coronavirus and flew at the same time, it s very dangerous.- coronavirus and flew at the same time, it s very dangerous. yes, we had doctor time, it s very dangerous. yes, we had doctorjenny time, it s very dangerous. yes, we had doctorjenny harries time, it s very dangerous. yes, we had doctorjenny harries the - time, it s very dangerous. yes, we | had doctorjenny harries the former deputy had doctorjenny harries the former deputy chief medical officer who was a familiar deputy chief medical officer who was a familiar face from quite a lot of government press conferences, particularly last year, she is heading particularly last year, she is heading up this new health security agency heading up this new health security agency and has given this warning about agency and has given this warning about the agency and has given this warning about the twin threat of coronavirus an
dangerous coronavirus, you would not design this one. if we can find any evidence of this virus previously having been sequenced or worked on, maybe there s fragments of the virus which were used previously in experiments, it would be, quote unquote, a smoking gun. and we didn t find anything at all. and by march 2020, anderson published what would become the most influential paper in support of the natural origin theory. by the end of april 2020, the bioengineered weapon theory seemed to have been laid to rest. the director of national intelligence puts out this really remarkable memo in which they agreed with the broad scientific consensus that the virus was not man made or genetically altered. a few hours later, president trump comes out. and what gives you a high degree of confidence that this originated from the wuhan institute of virology? i can t tell you that. i m not allowed to tell you that. over the course of 2020,
naturally emerged virus. anderson and other scientists worked around the clock searching for clues deep in the geno. the engineering aspect of this very quickly released we don t have the evidence to support that. even though they initially thought this novel virus had evidence of bio engineering, they subsequently found similar traits in other naturally occurring viruses. we debated and decided if you were a human trying to design a really dangerous coronavirus, you would not design this one. we didn t find any evidence of this virus previously having been sequenced or worked on. maybe there is fragments of the virus, which were used previously in experiments would be quote unquote a smoking gun and we didn t find anything at all. and by march 2020, anderson published the most influential paper in support of the natural