the source, it s the information he provides. how is it checked, who are the sources. what rules are in place for something like this. is this his opinion or does this come from intelligence sources. did it come from people in pakistan or afghanistan? i think it s a confusing issue. people just aren t sure where the information is coming from, whether it s valid motion it is information. the heart of the report speaks to how we are reliant on contractors now in our intel services and conclusion is that s posing a lot of serious problems. may i come to the defense of the washington post? i think this piece of what i have read of it wiive nod had a chance to read both installments of it. but it seems to be professionally reported. dana post is an incredibly competent reporter. a number of people working on this piece for a long period of time. i don t see any evidence of bias