the hospital center of allms the folks did to save these people. dana: he was visited at the hospital today by a friend of his, speaker of the house paul ryan. the media has been charging republicans and on monday huffington post had to deletef an entire article after they fell for a bogus anti-trauma memo. it claimed his presidential campaign paid thousands ofof dollars to boost itself on minutes. then on thursday, the new york times tried to blame sarah palin for the 2011 shooting of gabby giffords, even though that had been debunked years ago. did you hear anything internally at the a new york times that there was consternation in terms of dismay about it, in their own reporting in the paper they had debunked this years ago. no, the skin from the editorial board, it didn t come
we are all well aware here at the hospital center of all those folks did to save these people. dana: he was visited at the hospital today by a friend of his, speaker of the house paul ryan. the media has been charging republicans and on monday huffington post had to delete an entire article after they fell for a bogus anti-trauma memo. it claimed his presidential campaign paste the mic paid thousands of dollars to boost itself on minutes. then on thursday, the new york times tried to blame sarah palin for the 2011 shooting of gabby giffords, even though that had been debunked years ago. did you hear anything internally at the new york times that there was consternation in terms of dismay about it, in their own reporting in the paper they had debunked this years ago. no, the skin from the
editorial board, it didn t come from charles blow, or paul krugman a partisan type of congress, columnist, this is the heart and brain of the maritimes saying this is what happened. even political action said there is no evidence of this whatsoever after-the-fact. here s my problem with what they done since. the story has not come down. remember when reagan said to tear down this wall? the new york times needs to tear down this story. at least huffington post took down the story. you go online right now, the new york times, you still see that story. i say to them tear down this story and the corrections at the bottom, not the top. anybody who reads it thinks they are reading act until they get to the bottom. dana: having been a press secretary, and you finally get a reporter to run a correction, they would run the next week and it would be in a box and he could barely see it. the right has caught up with a left on social media and now a
keep them on the back foot. if they re worried about how they re going to sleep tonight and whether they re going to survive through the night, they don t have time to plot, plan an attack europe in the united states. we have to keep the pressure on and we have to give a longer-term strategy in place that s going to undermine the ideology. dana: you were in special ops and you understand a lot of what s happening in afghanistan, would you support the idea of the pentagon sending 4,000 more troops and what do you think their highest use would be once they get to the country? the troops that are going to afghanistan are not going to be kicking in doors and pulling triggers, they re going to be advisors that are helping the afghan army gets to a better place, get to a position of strength and to keep the television on their back foot. we need to do that to keep the tell a man from making more gains this summer. there s a lot of commentary on how hard this is, we ve been here 15 years,
supreme court finally ruling on this issue with sanctuary cities? it s almost as if you both agree, you don t think they need to do that? it is a waste of time. they re going to say a city and a state cannot oppose the federal government the problem is dana: you don t think they need to hear that from the federal government to allow ice to do what they are asked to do by congress? ever since arizona, alabama, georgia, we ve been trying to put band-aids on this issue for 17 years. that s why we need immigration reform law and you said it right. here we would agree on that. preach on, amen. dana: i ll give you a chance, both of you. what are the top three things you want to see in an immigration reform bill, what would help solve the problem and protect legal people that are here and keep them safe? people who do not have a