presidency of the united states. and what we know about hillary clinton, which we did not know about, as dan said about bill clinton, going back to the first huge ethics scandal the travelgate. there s no time to represent everything that went on in this horrendous moment in the clinton administration. it went on forever. and this produced her famous comment, the great right wing conspiracy. did she just play her best card? yes. which is the woman presidency card? was it a desperation move? no. i think it s i think it is simply just in it. it is a part of her to believe that she is going to run this. the question again is the american electorate, are they going to make this choice that we are going to vote for somebody entirely because of this political correct point we
this enormous danger all of the world is facing from a nuclear armed iran and what is the white house busy doing? something you have heard all week. they are busy in this extraordinary opera, this pettish aria of disgrace directed dorothy, i do hope i never cross you. that s a fact. mary, bring us up to date with congress. what s going to happen? dan has told us senator corker has 64 votes in the senate to make sure any deal with iran goes through congress. 67 would be veto proof. where does it go from here, mary. there s never been a significant arms control agreement with congressional approval, a major deal. congress also imposed a series of sanctions on iran, so congress wants to be involved. there s a bipartisan coalition, as dan explained, that needs to be involved, i think will be involved. i think netanyahu s speech put democrats in a very difficult position. this was a methodical, powerful
a sharply divided supreme court heard oral arguments this week in a case that could determine the future of president obama s signature health care law. with the fate of federal subsidies for nearly 8 million americans appearing to rest in the hands of just two justices we re back with dan and james, joe rego also joins the panel. james, do you first, if i may, wrap up those oral arguments, please. well, i think we learned three things from thehe oral arguments. first, we have no idea where john roberts, the chief justice stands on this. his questions were completely unrevealing of his inclinations. second, the four democratic nominees to the court have all made up their mind we re aggressively defending the administration s position and we re making arguments that the
dan, the governors of the states if the subsidies within those states are struck down, do the governors have a new approach? they definitely do not have a new approach. relying on the republicans in he rep the congress to come up with an alternative to obamacare. the politics of this are just going to be overwhelmingly difficult for the republicans if it s turned down. remember the obamacare rollout, how bad that was for the ollout democrats. you re talking about ann insurance system.e talk it s complicated. you re talking abouttinsu subsidies an and things liked that. and people who have insurance under obamacare if it s d will overturned, will immediately turn to ripepublicans and say what do i do in the next week? they have not shown themselves think able to manage t much of anything wellemselves politically in the last five years. the question is are they going years to be able to take on this huge political challenge as joe has been describing it. if the supreme court strikes
launch her presidential bid as early as next month but revelations this week that hillary clinton used a private e-mail account to conduct official business during her four years as secretary of state is reportedly adding to concern in some liberal circles that putting a clinton on the ticket in 2016 may not be the democrats best move. so just how much legal and political trouble could hillary be facing? and do democrats have a backup plan if her candidacy runs aground? let s ask. wall street journal columnist and deputy editor dan haeger. editorial board member dorothy reveniwitz. to you first, dan, days after the revelation i am still shocked that she did this kind of thing. why on earth would a woman with that experience do something like that? well because the clintons, as usual, think that the rules aploya apply to everyone else and not to them and they make them up as they go along.