Just a question for staff, if you know. There was a reference to the state law around kind of the staff check out of alcohol. Do you know the status of that . No, im not aware of any change in that. All right. I would just echo commissioner antoninis thoughts. Im supportive of this project. Just a second question, sorry. Whole foods on the other end of ocean avenue, does this condition was this included in their approval . I dont believe it was, but i dont believe that they have they have staffed checkout counters. So, they have these are selfcheck out and i believe they have more staff check out at whole foods. As far as i know, this condition was not imposed on them. Im generally supportive and would move for approval with the additions for local hiring and wic that were presented by the project sponsor. Is there a second . Second. Commissioner moore. The only question i would ask mr. Crawford and perhaps that requires a little bit of research as to whether or not the conditions rega
Everything right and im supportive. Commissioner hillis. Just a question for staff, if you know. There was a reference to the state law around kind of the staff check out of alcohol. Do you know the status of that . No, im not aware of any change in that. All right. I would just echo commissioner antoninis thoughts. Im supportive of this project. Just a second question, sorry. Whole foods on the other end of ocean avenue, does this condition was this included in their approval . I dont believe it was, but i dont believe that they have they have staffed checkout counters. So, they have these are selfcheck out and i believe they have more staff check out at whole foods. As far as i know, this condition was not imposed on them. Im generally supportive and would move for approval with the additions for local hiring and wic that were presented by the project sponsor. Is there a second . Second. Commissioner moore. The only question i would ask mr. Crawford and perhaps that requires a little
Require the committee, it would require continuance at the full board. ~ thats exactly right. And a reduction, simple reduction in height. If that happens, im not saying it will, would not require continuance . Thats right. Okay, thank you. Mr. Givens, did you want to make another comment about these . Yeah, sure. Early in the discussion before Public Comment, the committee was discussing different types of impact fees. And supervisor kim mentioned theres a total of 115 million in benefits and contributions coming from the developer here. And i just wanted to clarify for the benefit of the public really that there are some Development Fees that flow from the boards Regulatory Approval i believe somewhere in the range of 17 million and there is a separate proprietary agreement between Successor Agency and the developer where the parties have negotiated for a number of other benefits and contributions that total approximately 97, 98 million, totaling 115 that the developer is paying out.
Why the Transit Center [speaker not understood], really across the street from the plan itself. I think given the fact that we are working on mitigation for open space type safety, it doesnt take care of everything, but i think it is certainly significant contribution to the neighborhood. It would be very hard for me to oppose the height increase for this project, but not for any other. And i think it is it important because theres so Much Development in district 6 ~ that im consistent in how i determine policy. I do think prop k is a very legitimate argument, but again, you know, its one that we we allocated more shadows for through the Transit Center district plan. And being that they were paying the same fees that they would have paid if they were across the street, i think that there isnt a distinct difference, then, between these developments. But it is a hard decision. We certainly know that members of our constituents are very opposed to the height of this project, and i agree.