you ve now seen it. yes, we had a good time. we had a good time. no plot spoilers, but we enjoyed it. 0k. the two other members of my party thought it wasn t a vintage villain. that was their observation, as people who are steeped in vintage bond. one thing i think about this is there is an old myth that bond movies are only as good as their villain, and that s not true. it is one of the movies that s actually about bond, not about the villain. it is about him. in the same way on her majesty s secret service is about him and the dalton movies are about him. i really like it. it has proved quite divisive. some people thinks it breaks bond rules, but i like that about it. did you find yourself swept up? for the most part, yes, and there were a few flashes of humour. i love that. i want my bond to say something a little bit caustic with a glint in his eye. so, you want sean connery, roger moore?
they are steeped in vintage bond. one thing i think about this is there is an old myth that bond movies are only as good as their villain, and that s not true. it is one of the movies that s actually about bond, not about the villain. in the same way on her majesty s secret service is about him and the dalton movies are i really like it. it has proved quite divisive. some people thinks it breaks bond rules, but i like that about it. did you find yourself swept up? for the most part, yes, and there were a few flashes of humour. i love that. i want my bond to say something a little bit caustic with a glint in his eye. so, you want sean connery, roger moore? yeah, i m afraid. i know people won t all agree with that. this isn t a roger moore bond. it is a more serious bond. i think daniel craig