Changes in fiscal policy will probably be needed. Its not our job to lien those up. Its the job ch congress to decide what policy changes over time might line those lines up. First, please join me in thanking these two guys for such a good [ applause] i also want to remind everybody that all of this and more is on our website. As you know, these events dont happen automatically. Everyone for helping us make this such a success. Im no more certain about what the right answers are, but im a lot more sophisticated about my understanding of uncertainty and i hope the same is true for you. Finally, people on the hutchins advisory committee, marty phillips, others, would like to take a picture. I appreciate it. For the rest of you, thank you very much. [ applause] in about an hour, remarks from donald trump at the Economic Club of washington. Hell discuss the trump brand entrance into the d. C. Business community and his possible political aspirations. See those comments live 7 00 p. M. East
Sell oil and share the revenues. Again, is it going to last or is it just another shortlived political deal . My worries are, my hope is, of course, that it will be a step in the right direction and the right direction being a National Hydrocarbon law that has at least the quad political backing on both sides, but i also have worries. Past legacy is not very promising and, of course, we also have all of these pending issues such as land, such as revenue sharing, the grievances of boss are, the bosra, that the same that is echoed, why should the kurdish share oil with the government. These are challenges that the hydrocarbon deal is being faced with. I think kurdish oil policy when t initially started in 2004 2005, some say how oil is being managed. The pushback in baghdad was so strong and fierce and aggressive, this small cat was correspond into the corner and it was turned into a tiger that is thousand big enough for baghdad to deal with. That has been one of the landmarks of kurdish
He will launch a leadership pac in january. We have an interview from earlier this month at 9 30 p. M. Eastern here on cspan. Next, to british politics. David cameron appearing today before the British Liaison Committee answering questions on Climate Change priorities and combating extremism. This is 90 minutes. Welcome, Prime Minister. We have two things to ask you about today. The first is on Climate Change and the second is radicalization. Before we start, i think it might be right after the events of yesterday and today i just want to say its right to pitcher be to those who were murdered in australia. Today this appalling outrage in pakistan. Im sure the thoughts will be with the families and loved ones of those who parish. In australia, there are tales of extraordinary bravery and sacrifice now being told about what happened in that half fan that is what we would expect from people from that remarkable and great country. The scale of what has happened simply defies belief. It is
Americans not scrutinizing it too closely. Happened inwhat 2005 in 2006. The financial crisis in 2008 has really caused a lot of people to the fundamental propositions of the u. S. Foreignpolicy. And the onese approach is to continue to count on this disconnect. It is not a new phenomenon and frankly it hasnt really it plays out that way and a minute. I think that is a reasonable approach. There is a couple different ways this manifests itself. During the cold war, this of course, it was a bipartisan problem. Is. Is how vital it and to not resort to the sort of that characterizes u. S. Foreignpolicy. Dean achesons book. The senator advise dean to scare the hell out of the american i will paint said a picture clearer than the truth. In long history of american in agnpolicy, speaking way that it doesnt expect them to respond well enough or urgently enough unless things are painted to them clearer than the truth. Out three aspects that will bring the American People into the discussion. W
Most innovative country in the world, most creative, work labor law that is unique in the developed world, a big place full of chances to expand, the history of productivity, all this stuff has been cast aside temporarily. We are moping around like we are france, with all due respect. [applause] the french have a lot of great things going on. I dont want to be disrespectful. They have a lot of interesting things, but we are not france for crying out loud. We are not seizing the moment. Were not aspiring to be young and dynamic again. If we fix a few big substantive things, we could be american again. So which things . You want them in order of importance . Your choice. I will give you five. I would say in Energy Policy based on American Innovation and north american resources, all in. We should be Energy Secure with mexico, canada, and the United States within five years. If we aspire to that, we can do it. A regulatory system based on a 21st century economy, not they 19th or 20th cent