Latest Breaking News On - Dakota rejects limiting pollution exclusions - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Some jurisdictions consider the ISO-form "bodily injury" definition to be ambiguous as to whether emotional distress requires physical harm to be bodily injury. Many insurers have.

South dakotaUnited statesPennsylvania supreme courtSupreme courtMichigan courtAlaska supreme courtDakota supreme courtIllinois supreme courtEmotional distress claim not covered whereRequired physicalJoins majorityRuling faulty workmanshipDakota rejects limiting pollution exclusionsTraditional environmentalSouth dakota supreme courtExclusion precluded coverage