This is an addendum to the prior article, Circuits in Session: How AI Challenges Traditional Appellate Dynamics. That article reported on my experiment with use of ChatGPT as an.
Gociman failed to allege a specific promise for in-person instruction.
5 Indeed, in that case, Loyola was able to show that the materials contained limiting references like “published for information purposes,” and statements reserving the university’s right to change at any time and without notice the content of the written materials.
6 Notably, Loyola’s difference in tuition for online versus in-person instruction was insufficient to allege a specific contractual promise.
7
Standing was another key reason for the dismissal in
Gociman. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held that parents paying tuition and fees so that their adult children can enroll at a university did not thereby establish standing.