daca was enacted by president obama on his executive authority. it can be rescinded by president trump on his executive authority. one more effectiveness, though, there has been a lot of talk about deal on capitol hill for daca legalization in favor of the wall or some other policies the president wants. democrats don t need the deal. the courts are going to keep daca alive and possibly restorative. they are doing their work for them. bret: mollie, it seems like it s common sense that this thing was not set up legislatively, and would need to come if it had to go forward, so reading between the lines, the federal judges looking for a better explanation? the constitution gives the authority for this type of program to congress. congress is the one that should be doing this. a very similar type of program that president obama had was ruled unconstitutional in state attorney general challenged. it would be exactly the same situation with this one.
it details plans for border security, $30 billion for a border wall, and increased technology. daca legalization, 1.8 million illegal immigrants given a pathway to legalization, protecting only the nuclear family when it comes to chain migration and eliminating the lottery and repurchasing visas. who the president s instance insistence on a wall is clear. there is more vocal opposition from environmentalists. casey stegall is in texas, looking at both sides of the story. tucked away in south texas, a place unlike any other. this has the largest diversity of plants and animals of any refuge in all of north america. santa ana national wildlife refuge spans more than 2,000 acres along the texas-mexico border, segments of president trump s wall are supposed to be built here. the refuge that was created
going to look terrible for them. they deep-sixed to this. they whitewashed it. and they don t the documents coming out showing how badly they covered it up. tucker: since your writing about this, and you are an attorney, watched you think the chances are, if you or i were af felonious behavior, that the fbi director would say, let s stop this investigation before even interviewing us? it would never happen. if an average lawyer destroyed 30,000 pieces of evidence, he would be disbarred and prosecuted criminally. anybody else would have been prosecuted criminally, and as an attorney, disbarred, under these exact same circumstances. tucker: you ve got to think martha stewart is watching this, who did time in federal prison for lying to an fbi agent and thinking, man, i could have hired hillary clinton s lawyers. ty, thanks for coming on tonight. well, that some republicans in congress are now suggesting they d be willing to swap daca
some are willing to reinstate daca unconditionally. others are suggesting a possible deal along these lines, amnesty for daca in return for a border wall on the mexican border. congressman eric swalwell isn t interested in that deal. he said it would just give you a pass to be a slight racist on monday so you can be fully d racist on tuesday. he joins us tonight. so daca, if you re opposed to it, that makes you a racist? good evening, tucker. i want to update your viewers. i am working with republicans on the stranded americans in the caribbean right now. it s not just the people who are going to be leaving florida, we have thousands in the caribbean and other countries. just to update that. we re working with the state department. t tucker: good for you. tucker, i want to say that i believe that donald trump s wall and the premise for his wall, yes, iss racist. having border security is a responsibility we have, but these dreamers are part of our country, and whether you follo
they deep-sixed this. they whitewashed it. and they don t want the documents coming out showing how badly they covered it up.he tucker: since you re writing about this, and you are an attorney, watched you think what do you think the chancs are if you are i were accused of felonious behavior that the fbi director would say let s stop this investigation before interviewing us. it would never happen. if an average lawyer destroyed 30,000 pieces of evidence, he would be disbarred andti prosecuted criminally. anybody else would have been prosecuted criminally, and as an attorney, disbarred, under these exact same circumstances. tucker: you ve got to think martha stewart is watching this, who did time in federal prison for lying to an fbi agent, and thinking, man, i could have hired hillary clinton s lawyers. ty, thanks for coming on tonight. well, now some republicans in congress are now suggesting they d be willing to swap daca legalization in return for a border wall.