that is interesting, but raises questions about why the feds have not looked into that over the past few years. in some places, it seems like the garland justice department would be the last place you would want to order a pizza from, it might come two plus years later. the context is interesting, although maybe completely unrelated because yesterday, the legal world was rocked by something you don t normally see. you can see the headlights, reactions, and that special grand jury foreperson in georgia just went out in public doing tv out appears interviews , talking sometimes clearly, sometimes indirectly about indictments they recommended. we counted at least five media appearances within 24 hours, a widely unusual spectacle. appearances in a process that would usually be completely secret. we definitely heard a lot about former president trump, and we definitely discussed him a lot in the room. i will say that, when this list comes out, there are no major plot twists wait
that is interesting, but raises questions about why the feds have not looked into that over the past few years. in some places, it seems like the garland justice department would be the last place you would want to order a pizza from, it might come two plus years later. the context is interesting, although maybe completely unrelated because yesterday, the legal world was rocked by something you don t normally see. you can see the headlights, reactions, and that special grand jury foreperson in georgia just went out in public doing tv out appears interviews , talking sometimes clearly, sometimes indirectly about indictments they recommended. we counted at least five media appearances within 24 hours, a widely unusual spectacle. appearances in a process that would usually be completely secret. we definitely heard a lot about former president trump, and we definitely discussed him a lot in the room. i will say that, when this list comes out,
to give it to you straight. last night, we began with why this is big news. we have investigation of former president with a grand jury leak and recommended indictments of at least some people, but there is another aspect to this, i discussed this last night with one of our legal experts, john flannery me some of this may not be great for a full and fair legal process. that goes to how this works. prosecutors are people, witnesses are people, grand jurors are people. in their honesty, even transparency, which we welcome, you also hear things, oh my gosh, is that what is driving this? and at times, this foreperson, glad we are speaking out from information perspective, set and raise questions about what the incentives are. shout out to blaine alexander, who got the big interview, and through questioning learned, the foreperson said, when it came to this big, weighty, legal question about potentially subpoenaing the
thank you so much for letting us into your homes during these truly extraordinary times. someday, we will stop saying that, but not gait. we are grateful. hi, ari. thank you so much. welcome to the beat. we begin with how these legal probes seem to begin, or at least have developments in the trough cases. and more developments about indictments, also several new subpoenas hitting trump s inner circle. nicole was just reporting on this. the new york times reports that the and once testimony from kushner and evoke a truck.
us that might be accustomed to some of this because of professional or otherwise, have some sort of surprise or disdain, some people, the fact that what you are saying, you ve seen this other grand jury, the emotional response as well? she is basically no different than a lot of regular trial jurors i have had or regular grand jurors i have had . people are brought out of their regular lives to do something that is quite extraordinary. having said that, if you are the da preparing indictments, is this helpful? i would not say it is hurtful. why not? don t you want to have the usual secrecy? the usual secrecy is not quite as important here. this is not the charging grand jury. this will be a different grand jury that the charges are brought to. she was discharged over duties, given certain rules. do you see any evidence she has broken those rules? kind of a little bit by rolling her eyes with the atlanta journal-constitution. she may have used communication to convey tha