for someone who built his political career, of course, on the notion he is a billionaire, maybe not so much. whether or not that is literally true. none of this is final until the judge signed off on all of it, but as we saw, it has not stopped yet, the former president from making it politically. he went on social media with one of his all-time favorite charges, that phrase, say it with me now, witchhunt, and claiming there are legal systems being used as a political weapon. but here s the thing. to damages that are vastly bigger than anyone expected allow him to frame all of this as an attack against him? after all, more than half of voters in our new hampshire exit poll said donald trump would be fit for presidency, even if he is convicted of a crime. joining me now are gwendolyn, a former da in dekalb county georgia, and rena shaw. i m so glad both of you are here, but first of all i have got to get your reaction to this, when thinking about that this is an $83 million ve
court ruling that didn t go his way. top court dealing with affirmative action. that means merit agains and the media will need a fainting couch. the worst thing about affirmative action is that it created a clarence thomas. clarence thomas has criticized affirmative action and we know that s why he s on the supreme court. i think this is sticking dag dag dager in our back. we will see that segregation become wider and wider. what s next, gay marriage? is this leading to no women in colleges soon? who knows. no women in college. we can dream. i joke. biden wasn t done sobbing running over to the safe space of msnbc. find it so out of sorts with the basic value system of the american people. do you worry without court reform this conservative majority is too young and too conservative that they might do too much harm? i think they may do too much harm. ink some of the court are beginning to realize their legitimacy is being questioned in ways it had not bee
Warning to israel, the comments from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about a ground invasion. Nikki haley is coming off the sidelines, as the 11th hour gets underway on this thursday night. Good evening, i am katie fang in for stephanie ruhle, 14 days in to Donald Trumps criminal trial, Stormy Daniels returned to the Witness Stand and faced off against trumps defense team in a very interesting crossexamination. My colleague Laura Jarrett has more. Reporter tonight, Stormy Daniels leaving court after a blistering crossexamination. Former President Trumps team suggesting she has been trying to cash in on her story of sex with mr. Trump at a celebrity Golf Tournament 18 years ago which he denies ever happened. The defense accusing her of lying. Trumps attorney, Susan Necheles, hammering her years of acting and directing the poor in industry, saying it gave a lot of experience in making funny stories about sex appeal or appear real. She fired back and said that the story was untrue i wou
you stab someone repeatedly it s intent. he wasn t even charged with an intentional crime. he was charged with a reckless manslaughter and not intent. it was easier for grand jury to dismiss where in manhattan, you had the grand jury charged on manslaughter and on negligent homicide as well . there was no intent in the danny penny case. he thought the cpr people would come no and i found out today from source that they were looking for narcan. that s ha what they thought was going on. i attribute it to different da offices and i d rather have danny penny in court in brooklyn where everybody is on the subway than in man thathattan where
do you believe that this life-saving legislation should be advanced in widely in states and the federal government? we just passed it here in new york state and it s effective august of this year. so it s brand-new. it s one week old. but i believe that it has the possibility of preventing a lot of tragedy. and having it s done in a way that i think protects due process rights because a court has to be involved. they have to find is there a legal standard by clear and convincing evidence, was there probable cause to believe that the person would hurt themselves or another, there s legal protections put in. but it allows many different entities, police and the da offices and others to go into civil court and take these guns away.