Aljazeera for Us Democratic congressman and say they will not be silenced by President Donald Trump they were responding to trumps comments that they are anti american and his call for them to go back home we ran on a mandate to advocate for him to represent those ignored left out and left behind our squad has been our squad includes any person committed to building a more equitable and just world and that is the work that we want to get back to and given the size of this squad and this great nation we cannot we will not be silenced. As we all know the recent tweets and words from the president are simply a continuation of his racist zina phobic playbook we cannot allow these hateful actions by the president to distract us from the critical work to hold this Administration Accountable to the inhumane conditions at the border that is separating children from their loved ones and caging them up in the legal horrific conditions. Mexico and guatemala have rejected new u. S. Measures aimed
Saying the white house has spotted his forces preparing for another potential chemical weapons attack and said they would quote pay a heavy price if they proceed with such an attack. The u. S. Ambassador to the u. N. Nikki haley said any further attacks to the people of syria will be blamed on assad. Nbcs matt bradley has breaking details from london. What more do we know . Thanks, frances. Middle eastern observers are calling this an unprecedented step in u. S. Foreign policy, so rare to fire a shot across the bow like it did last night. The president s statement was pretty vague. The white house said theyre seeing movements on the ground that they say are similar to those that led up to the chemical attack in western syria back in april. That attack killed 100 people and injured hundreds more. In response, 60 cruise missiles at the Syrian Government air base he said launched the attacks. That was the first time the u. S. Forces attacked the syrian regime. Remember, the u. S. Says its
What to look for to bring somebody forward for a possibility of a court review for em. This is not Carte Blanche like i said, for the Sheriffs Department to let everybody out. This is the exception to the rule so those people who have proven in custody over the period of supervision time that they dont have behavior problems, their history, violence history is not something that would preclude them from em. Understand that all em criteria which indicates who can and cannot get on em is very strict. Thats not going to change. Thats still going to be held in place. Whats going to be added to those restrictions is if a person in the legislation has a certain low level offense, theyve proven themselves in custody, that might be something the court will want to look at to reevaluate their decision on bail or em the power is still with the judge. My understanding of the system, and this is from some of the my time working in the Law Enforcement system. When you have low level non violent off
You age and if you let them take away these things out here it really just go to show that money means everything in San Francisco and we cant keep on doing this. You know, you coming next, the richer get rich. The rich eat the rich. You know, so its amazing that housing in San Francisco you got rid of the blacks, you got rid of the mexicans, now you going for the seniors and disability. This is what it boils down to. You know what . You go on to different levels, but its not right and i hope the president announce [inaudible] will get here. Housing right is a human right. Thank you very much. Are there any other members of the public that wish to speak on Public Comment on this item . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. With that, item 49 is in the hands of the board. Supervisor campos. Thank you very much. I want to begin by thanking you for letting us have this hearing today and i especially want to thank the residents of the University Mound ladies home who have come out to spea
Briefing over however period of time so you understand what the contrast is. Theres no way shape or form that i as sheriff and that this department would want to do anything to forward any risk or compromise to Public Safety, but the notion that i heard being put out there, whether this is true in the perception or not of some, that we would unilaterally put what we are proposing is the same way that theres a response mechanism by the da and court who often asks us could we put a sex offender or somebody for child important electronic monitoring, we have the right to say no and we often do. But what weve noticed though, by the way weve said no to people being put on em, its happening anyway, a Cottage Industry has erupted that is not supervised by the Sheriffs Department and by state statute, all em for sentence population supervised by the Sheriffs Department. To allow somebody to be be put on,m even after weve rejected it, and were trying to reign that practice in. If this detail is,