have been accompanied by statements from the israeli military saying that there are no civilians in gaza, that we are fighting a war against human animals, and therefore we will not allow humanitarian aid into gaza. , ., will not allow humanitarian aid into gaza- into gaza. israel says it is allowing into gaza. israel says it is allowing aid into gaza. israel says it is allowing aid into - into gaza. israel says it is allowing aid into gaza - into gaza. israel says it is| allowing aid into gaza and into gaza. israel says it is - allowing aid into gaza and part of the checks are to ensure that aid and other supplies don t end up in the hands of the hamas. i know you are also the hamas. i know you are also the founder or co founder of gisha access, an israeli and you re protecting the free movement of palestinians. beyond the bombardment and the civilian casualties we have also seen a restriction, haven t we, the part of palestinians not being able to enter israeli territory, where
uninhabitable. you agree with that assessment? that assessment? i do. and there is a that assessment? i do. and there is a reason that assessment? i do. and there is a reason for- that assessment? i do. and there is a reason for it. - that assessment? i do. and there is a reason for it. the| there is a reason for it. the reason is the warring parties, israel, hamas, and islamic jihad, are flouting very basic principles of the laws of war, would say that you have to protect civilians. if we look at why people in gaza don t have enough food and water, are life threatening sanitation situations, it is because the israeli military has refused to abide by the obligation to ensure that civilians in gaza are adequately supplied. i was do this all this time that make all the time and that is what they have to do. when you prepare for war, you have to prepare for war, you have to prepare for war, you have to prepare for how the civilian population will survive the war. that is what israel
unfortunately the trajectory we are on which would lead to a devastating regional war. the easiest way of preventing that is to have a ceasefire in gaza. israel would say a ceasefire would simply allow hamas to regroup, potentially give hezbollah an upper hand as well, right? well, right? that is the israeli argument - well, right? that is the israeli argument but i well, right? that is the israeli argument but atj well, right? that is the - israeli argument but at the same time we have seen now the israelis have failed to achieve the their objectives, the former israeli prime minister said the chances of complete the defeating hamas which is what the israeli government seeks to do is put those charges at nil and we have a completely unacceptable amount of civilian deaths. if this goes on for much longer israel will not achieve its objectives but it will lead to a larger war which could drag in the us. this week we saw the killing of the deputy head of hamas had
strong ties with iran and hezbollah as well, how do you think his bowler might react, we have heard from the lead on friday saying a response was inevitable? inevitable? some form of response inevitable? some form of response probably - inevitable? some form of response probably is - inevitable? some form of - response probably is inevitable but the question has been well his bowler read this as the crossing of a redline that would force them to go out on a with israel or will be treated as an escalation that will warrant a counter escalation from hezbollah but something thatis from hezbollah but something that is short of all out war, it appears to be the latter, it does not appear to be hezbollah has much of a desire for a full scale war, in fact a full scale war, in fact a full scale war, in fact a full scale war would be to its detriment strategically but it is also very unlikely it would leave the and responded to. again, all these small steps are bringing us closer and closer