supervisors. three levels. three levels and the response to that was losing your security clearance, shutting you out, losing your job, taking away your pay. that s correct. i am so frustrated and angry and i only have a minute and a half left to try to display the level of corruption, weaponization, politization that has occurred at the highest levels of the f.b.i. and d.o.j. and both director wray and merrick garland have sat and testified there is no retri retribution. we have testimony. testimony is a fact in evidence that that is exactly what s going on in the f.b.i. and d.o.j. just quickly talk about how the inflation, mr. friend, of the domestic violence the statistics as it relates to january 6th how they were inflating those statistics to
responsibilities i have to see what the f.b.i. s and the d.o.j. has done to follow up on it. we need to know what that evidence is and i don t know why anybody would want to hide it. i think the democrats should come forward. if they re so confident that joe biden didn t do anything wrong, great! then release the document. let s get it all out there in public. sunshine is the best disinfectant. kayleigh: the democrats, of course, aren t interested. the russia hoax leader himself, you know who he is, adam schiff already downplaying it. i don t think you can put much stock in anything that mr. comer has to say because his track record is very poor. when they put before the so-called whistleblowers before congress, none of it has born out. i don t know whether this is just pure speculation that they believe there s a document of an interview or lots of interviews. it doesn t necessarily mean there s any wrongdoing. so i wouldn t give much stock to this. kayleigh: you know, putting
true but it should be backed up with stats and information and questions about who is committing the violence. can t be a claim that is self-evidently true. a rise in hate crime against christians that goes without the claim. no one is saying it but you have the evidence that you just pointed to and it is ignored not just in popular culture and the media but ignored by the d.o.j. now, if you have one thing that is we have to accept it s true without evidence and another that we have to ignore even in the face of evidence, what you have is an informational war that dictates our priorities. that is an administration saying look over here, don t look over there. here is what s important, here is what s unimportant. right now christians are unimportant. harris: i tell you, that informant situation is something to keep our eye on. they are not looking for anything but christians. they are looking at us inside the churches to figure out what we do and some of the wording
recent days, you covered this on the weekend on fox & friends , that the f.b.i. and the d.o.j. are trying to deny that there would be any informants inside catholic churches. yes, is that to me, harris? here is what i would say. i think there is a war going on, harris. a war for our mind. it is an informational war. i don t know if you ve seen the clip. you probably have, of elon musk being interviewed by a bbc interviewer about the rise in hate speech on twitter. here is why i reference that. that interviewer takes it at self-evident there is a rise on hate speech. musk says provide evidence. he says give me one piece of evidence. and why bring that up? you hear things like rise in violence against trans people and it is accepted at true. i m not telling you it isn t
rhetoric is producing and it is not to protect them. martha: you just said, commissioner, you think it will. we are headed toward a nationwide ban. she thinks not. what do you say? i think part what is being reflected is the immense popularity of the application. 150 million americans are using it. surprising number. this argument that we can t ban tiktok consistent with the first amendment is not correct. supreme court case law when you target an entity for the conduct. that would be a violation of our national security law. you can ban it without triggering first amendment scrutiny. i think the evidence here is so overwhelmingly clear. they have said for years don t worry, this data doesn t exist in china. they denied surveilling the location of u.s. journalists but they did that. f.b.i., d.o.j. right now have an