summary judgment of a massive ought yen of viewers, a past logical fear of a ratings defeat and witches ease brew against in a network s own working journalists and fact checkers. we should tell you at any moment we re expecting breaking news in the form of fresh filens from dominion and fox, to lay out any arguments in the case. while we wait, for years we have turned to phrases lie inside the bubble and the echo chamber to describe that relationship between fox news and its viewers. never before has it been so plain to see from the outside. the discovery filings show that fox hosts were telling their viewers what they knew they wanted to here even when the very same fox news host communicated the truth to one another in private, which was different from what they were broadcasting. dominion s case may very well wrest on their ability to get a jury to understand that distinction. today, though, the story goes even further in the form of something rare. a highly visible i
perspective, they pull together some that he they were formulating the first major motions, for example, you have the depositions sworn answers under oath from rue pertain murdoch, the creator of fox. he had been deposed, but you also have paul ryan, is on the board of directors of fox corp, fox news parent company. you re seeing that the lawyers d. and dominion s side, they re presenting through what they re presenting what evidence they re presenting ruper murdoch, you know and now a major corporate official, major adviser to lachland