if it was over now. if this was the end of his four or eight year term, he would say president trump was negative g n nato. they are getting them to spend more, they are focused on cyber terror. you know in the last year and a half, they have come up with a 30 day quick action plan on land, sea and air in order to strike back against the russian threat that didn t really exist seven or eight years ago? and the head of nato even cited donald trump is given credit for pushing this type of change. could you just also possibly sit back and say, maybe doing something a little different might get us better results? you are right that the head of nato gave trump some credit and trump deserve some credit. but let s take this in context. remember that the obligation to spend 2% of your gdp upon your defense came in 2014. and most of the countries that
you can t put it on the backs of the governments. the russians are good at this. julie: if we can t contain our own u.s.-based social media, what are we doing to protect us from cyber terror? it does open a lot of doors that are have been alarming. that s why when i testified before congress, that was the big issue. lots of questions for mark. julie: morgan wright, thanks very much. you bet. eric: i thought facebook did that because it s fun. julie: no. eric: president trump blasting china s trade practices. a house committee gets ready to delve into the financial impact of those controversial tariffs. this is a problem caused by china. not a problem caused by president trump. i would go so far to say trump is there to fix the problem. hey! we didn t have a homeowners claim last year
start thinking about cyber terror. can make you think there is a missile attack. attempted to paralyze the power grid which would cause us to turn on each other. there s a a reason why internet billionaires in silicon valley, billionaires buying land and moving to new zealand. kimberly: dana, what did you make of putin s comment? dana: in the last eight years, we had a president who really wanted to try to believe that there could be a nuclear free world. that s the goal. it is so unrealistic. the military, the congressman from illinois it was on my show today. he said we are not prepared. i said, well, that s not very reassuring. he said our defenses could overwhelm putin so it s not that big of a deal. i think putin is feeling a lot of heat. he has an election coming up. obviously he s going to rig it. he looks pretty small.
donald trump responding. that was a state thing, but we are now going to get involved with them. i love that they took responsibility. they took total responsibility but we are going to get involved. take total responsibility. they made a mistake. juan: you can see this concern is don t blame me. wasn t me this time. that s his concern, as of close to expressing some of your outrage. greg: the proportion is so off. dana: the concern about it being a hack is a real one. cyber terror can come in lots of different forms. probably couldn t conceive of those forms. our responsibility, state or local government or federal government, trying to be more creative than what a criminal or hacker might do. if you have panic like that that leads to an accident, whether it
disaster happen when you re trying to get to see loved ones, i get rerouted, what are you going to do, what about your hotel. the whole thing. it s very challenging, especially atlanta is a hugely busy airport. it s unbelievable the amount of international flights and traffic coming in and out. think about it. it s the equivalent of something happening dana: they don t know what happened. they don t think it was anything, no cyber terror. but i think it shows how easily disrupted our lives are. greg: it could be artificial intelligence pretending it s an accident, already self-aware, doing these tests. it s a nice dry run on how an attack on the grid might look and feel, except if you enlarge it to entire states and extend the duration. you don t need to invade a country if you just have the humans in the country turn on themselves. if that went on another day,