wasn t going to name them currency manipulator is because china is no longer doing that. also that why would he do that when he wants china to do something for him on north korea. now is not the time. he is just recognizing that while in a campaign, you can take a hard line on one thing or the other. these pieces all relate when you move them around and you can t just say you will do something like label china a currency manipula manipulator. this was the criticism of him during the campaign. he had situations wrong. he was talking tough to belie the facts. let s play an example with nato. nato is obsolete. over 60 years old. it is many countries. doesn t cover terrorism. i complained about that a long time ago and they made a change and now they do fight