We had a Strategic Partnership now its a matter of ask we had a partner as did the new album trade being so that it. Was promoted by Frank Aldridge on myer but these it was a lady call a scientist because its too bad it wasnt in that one man does that its that they didnt implement them so russia refuses to live with youre going along the lines of a deal and youre at the union and now we are opponents regarding a lot of principle issues so but now they started to thinkers that are close to the German Government and the needs of jazz going to go away the who did. They say we need to refuse to have any bullets for kids my hands regarding the russian war isnt bad it was until recently about your unions urging that gas was but a strategic goal and why is that we should have contradiction with russia. We have mutual interests so these are dangerous regarding this new approach is a. Good look at reassure a dime add but even so lack the spartan level laxatives cooperation could only be possibl
Could move the eurodollar. We also focused on the oil markets. Saudi arabia faces a daunting oil market surplus. Up, they hear from the former lng executive. He proposed a takeover offer by the Hong Kong Exchange and we will have plenty more on the corporate story. It broke about 24 hours ago. They will have a look at the exact response of the london Stock Exchange. Lets get straight to bloomberg first word news. Bloomberg has learned in a show of goodwill that china may resume u. S. Farm inputs. This comes as donald trump says he is postponing a 5 tariff increase by two weeks. The delay causes u. S. Levies on chinese imports at 25 . Sweeping cats from a no deal brexit. Chaos from a no deal brexit. The warnings outlined in a u. K. Government paper. The internal document is called operation yellow hammer. Ministers were forced to release it to comply with the deadline. Law intendeding a to prevent Boris Johnson from forcing through a no deal brexit but he says he is ready to do it anywa
Square footage. And again no permits for five years. And all penalties go to the s. F. Small sites fund. So we do have some concerns about penalties and fines under section 319 and 317. Some of the largest concerns are about the undefined terms and unaccessible day that we need to have to implement this code section. Were also concerned about the entirety of the penalties being collected, except for our time and material costs being diverted away from our Code Enforcement fund. Thats a fund that our department relies on to continue our Code Enforcement work in the first place. Most importantly, not being able to seek a permit for five years, if youre found to be in violation, we worry that may lead to buildings falling into disreplayer or Property Owners abandoning those buildings all together, if they determine the cost to legalize the work and wait to go through the new approval process isnt going to pencil. So going into all other violations of the planning code, which are handled t
The height scale forms and architectural details of the entire surrounding neighborhood, as the neighborhood itself is quite mixed. The project, although it did add density, it did not add affordability equal to or greater than the existing building being demolished. So it wouldnt be approvable under that criteria. And the units, although similarly sized and with similar exposure, full floor flat plus down, and the other is floor floor unit and up, it exceeds the cap placed in the ordinance. Both roughly 2,000 square feet each. And lastly, the project includes the garage, which is also prohibited under this ordinance. Under section 319, just to sort of weave in all of the implication of this project, some of the criteria are redundant. It wouldnt be permitted under 319, as it adds a new garage. Architectural features are inherently, because its a demo, all of them are being removed. Thats a criteria that makes it prohibited from being approved. The project is less affordable. And the r
Previous Floor Area Ratio and Square Footage. And again no permits for five years. And all penalties go to the s. F. Small sites fund. So we do have some concerns about penalties and fines under section 319 and 317. Some of the largest concerns are about the undefined terms and unaccessible day that we need to have to implement this code section. Were also concerned about the entirety of the penalties being collected, except for our time and material costs being diverted away from our Code Enforcement fund. Thats a fund that our department relies on to continue our Code Enforcement work in the first place. Most importantly, not being able to seek a permit for five years, if youre found to be in violation, we worry that may lead to buildings falling into disreplayer or Property Owners abandoning those buildings all together, if they determine the cost to legalize the work and wait to go through the new approval process isnt going to pencil. So going into all other violations of the plan