And i, my family, like many neighbors as you just saw are fully behind and support a modest adjustment that is in front of the you to be able to see San Francisco stay . San francisco. I grew up in the east bay and went to college at uc davis and probably lost about 95 of my friends who viewed that San Francisco was unlivable, unfriendly for families. Parts of it is perception of the public schools. My kid goes to George Peabody in richmond we need to change the culture and the perception. This modest request is going to potentially allow a very good family in Laurel Heights area to stay in San Francisco. My wife and ana maria went to the Laurel Heights Improvement Association about this specific request. They were told that had they asked first they would fully support this assignment. So i find if very hard to believe that because their decisionmaking process was based upon who asked first really has a negative view about this project. Thank you. Thank you. Is there additional Public
Thank you. I just submitted the 12 letters of opposition to the project including from the suzuki family, whose garden is right behind it and the louie family who is next to me. Im on the executive committee and the laurel height as the association did not say it had anything to do who was there first, because they would have told me. I didnt get to mention that he wants to expand on the second floor and wants to deem the second floor nonconforming and bring a deck out to encroach into the year regard. That is an intensification of the nonconforming floor and he is trying to have his cake and eat it too. So the deck should be taken out, because that is an enlargement of the nonconforming on the second floor. Now he has got 505 square feet he wants to add about 370 for 00. 900 and that is bigger than your norman normal apartment. He is going to cut down a couple hundred of feet and still have 600, which is just as big as anything. And clearly, in your memorandum, staff indicated that th
Twominute rebuttal. Thank you. I just submitted the 12 letters of opposition to the project including from the suzuki family, whose garden is right behind it and the louie family who is next to me. Im on the executive committee and the laurel height as the association did not say it had anything to do who was there first, because they would have told me. I didnt get to mention that he wants to expand on the second floor and wants to deem the second floor nonconforming and bring a deck out to encroach into the year regard. That is an intensification of the nonconforming floor and he is trying to have his cake and eat it too. So the deck should be taken out, because that is an enlargement of the nonconforming on the second floor. Now he has got 505 square feet he wants to add about 370 for 00. 900 and that is bigger than your norman normal apartment. He is going to cut down a couple hundred of feet and still have 600, which is just as big as anything. And clearly, in your memorandum, sta
Behind it and the louie family who is next to me. Im on the executive committee and the laurel height as the association did not say it had anything to do who was there first, because they would have told me. I didnt get to mention that he wants to expand on the second floor and wants to deem the second floor nonconforming and bring a deck out to encroach into the year regard. That is an intensification of the nonconforming floor and he is trying to have his cake and eat it too. So the deck should be taken out, because that is an enlargement of the nonconforming on the second floor. Now he has got 505 square feet he wants to add about 370 for 00. 900 and that is bigger than your norman normal apartment. He is going to cut down a couple hundred of feet and still have 600, which is just as big as anything. And clearly, in your memorandum, staff indicated that this was the nonconforming apartment. Here is the [prao epl ] application. They didnt check the deck and the architect knows how t
Administrator said in an email to the supervisor he didnt know of any guideline and im going put that in the record, the email. Also, in the future, he shouldnt be allowed to move the nonconforming use designation, the planner says they can flip it, move it up, move it down by applying to them this the future and paying a fee. And it seems to me that if you allow it to be moved you ought to say that he should have to leave it where it is on the second unit or at least provide an opportunity for a notice, hearing and vote of the commission as to whether he should move it down again . Because otherwise it just provides a ruse any time you want to alter the nonconforming floor you just move it down. And so that is essentially the position that they are taking and planner said i should ask you for notice. So im asking you for notice and a hearing if you allow this . I have another point. He is not measuring from the ground level wall. He is measuring from the top wall. He is 10 over. The 1