running for reelection. five, where trump won by double digits. it s a tough vote. they ll be very quiet right until they have two vote. ed: brian fallon was democrats. he worked in the hillary clinton campaign. he is now in a group called, get demand justice. step going around to pretending there is some magic question that will get you a legitimate reinsurance that the nominee will protect roe v. wade. that s what he said. if they came from the list, it is freed from the poisonous tree. he is talking about the list of 25 conservative justices of the president said he would nominate back in the campaign if elected. there something else he said. this domination will determine whether we have four years of trump is him or 40 years. i think that crystallizes what the democrats are doing in terms of trying to block this. even if they cannot be president out a number of years, his
and their push is for tougher sanctions on russia, whether they be economic, a tougher response to russia rather than welcoming it into a group of america s closest allies, like g-7. and kevin, the continuing question. why is this happening? why is the president bringing up russia? former obama national security spokesman said that trump s statement, and i m quoting now, crystallizes precisely why putin was so eager to see trump elected. for putin this is a return on his investment and it s safe to say that his investment has paid off beyond even his wildest dreams. what s your thought on that? fred, i have no problem sitting here and defending the president s actions when i think they re just. i think this one is crazy. in many ways it emboldens russia. it s not smart for the president, it feels like it implicates him. certainly russia is a big nuclear power. they re a major force in that
the seychelles and appears to have omitted crucial details of the nature of that meeting where robert mueller appears to have access to which kind of crystallizes the gap between what s happening on the mueller side and what s happening in the intelligence committee. right, chris. he said he went to the seychelles and could have ran into someone who could set up this person who we now believe could have been a setup to be a back channel between the trump administration and the russian government through an emirati conduit. that now seems to be coming to a head in the mueller investigation. he is a looking into it. it appears to be a lie by erik prince. but the house committee did not find it necessary to go back and interview him. in fact, as matt pointed out, they spent a lot of their time on the politics of this. we know the nunes memo came out of this committee. that of course was to undermine the basis of the mueller investigation anyway, trying to say that it all depended on a
them about the meeting he had in the seychelles and appears to have omitted crucial details of the nature of that meeting where robert mueller appears to have access to which kind of crystallizes the gap between what s happening on the mueller side and what s happening in the intelligence committee. right, chris. he said he went to the seychelles and could have ran into someone who could set up this person who we now believe could have been a setup to be a back channel between the trump administration and the russian government through an emirati conduit. still have the majority who would have any kind of an impeachment trial on this president. of course. if it came to that. while it s easy to just dismiss it and say they didn t do their due diligence, if this is the conclusion of the body, it shows us where they stand on this, and that they don t think it s a political calculation they want to take to really look into this issue. that i think is true. one of the people, todd r
russian tradecraft so that they can be of aid to fbi and other agencies in preventing more of this type of activity in the future. it s tempting to get ahead of yourself when you see this sort of information leaking. but so much in trump junior s demeanor in this case, the way he denies, and then tells a little bit at a time, and none of it really makes sense, even to the point are we re hearing three key people in the trump campaign are going to this meeting, that they don t know who they ll meet with, they don t know what the topic is. we re still not at the end of this one. no. the timeline is just sort of crystallizes with the timeline with 2016. this meeting happening two weeks after donald trump sealed the nomination for the republican party in june. and also none of this being public information until both kushner and manafort had to make these amend statements about their interactions with the