skirt foya, and hoodwink this court. he didn t stop there. calling the clinton e-mail affair, one of if gravest modern offenses to government transparency. this judge has ordered additional fact-finding in the case. this is massive news and we ll continue to keep you updated. here to go through all of if day s news, fox news contributor and investigative reporter, sarah carter. the number of the russia hoax, the scheme to clear hillary clinton. one thing as i read through this, we got a lot of interesting things here. got a lot of really big sins like by the way, don t lie on a loan application. if you owe the taxes, pay the taxes. that s my advice. because obviousliout get in a lot of trouble. when you read these things, you say, okay, people did wrong things here. but none of it, not one bit of
discrete russia related matters that he gained through his contact with company executives during the campaign. cohen provided relevant and u useful information with his contacts of the white house during this time period. the filings don t explain more about the nature of the contacts. it s important to know that the u.s. attorney filing is very dramatic the way it written. it reads in part here in washington, we also had a filing on the president s former campaign chairman, one of the documents was filed under seal, which means it s not public. the other was released publicly.
he answered the questions, nothing about russia, only the e-mails and there was no problem with the fisa warrant process. it will also allow us to test the statements of republicans that a government lawyer really ran a lot of interference and shut down critical lines of questioning. tucker: if you look, christopher steele in the interrogatory, he wouldn t stand by his own dossier. if it was as the nunez and grassley information came from, then one has to question if this e-mail chain does exist as john solomon reported this week, that said directly that james comey s name was on it. did they verify it and when? what did they verify? what part of it was wrong? if it was the bulk of information, was a fraud committed on the court? also one other question. why didn t they tell the court
we re breaking some kind of a law. but then it s selective how it gets applied. but it s always hovering over you, this entire dynamic ranging from the dossier to which catherine herridge described about their writing in the filing that they just did. it s fan fiction. we re talking about criminal justice reform on one hand from the trump administration, of course and the american people see this fraud, this hoax being unleashed on people in washington. we experience it also at the local level in our daily lives, whether it s the disenfranchised, people of color. this is a chilling event. americans recognize it and don t like it and it s up to the president sean: the president the american people have to be clear about what is happening. sean: he can still release the applications, the gang of eight information and the 302s. last question, darrell issa. we just had comments from james comey. do you believe what he said about the fisa warrants was
it, gregg jarrett, has to do with trump, russia and collusion. it seems that the media is only fixated on one thing. that is michael cohen s payment as relates to stormy and karen mcdougal and somehow we have a campaign financial violation. i have a list of them from obama and other people that committed them, too. and they re civil penalties. they re not criminal cases. why? to prove a criminal case of campaign violation, you have to prove the candidate knowingly violated the campaign election laws and prosecutors rarely are able to prove that because most people in america, candidates especially, don t understand the incredibly complex laws. two things that we learned today. one, in all three of them, there s no reference to trump-russia collusion to win the election. the other thing that we learned is people like manafort are