calling the filibuster. at that point i think we will hear from the white house, they will have a choice, we will hear from the president. that is the point out which he will decide if we are going forward, and decide if we are a democracy are not. sherrilyn eiffel always great, thank you for taking the time. thank you chris. the house is expected to vote tomorrow to as a warning shot to any other when us is that plan on defying the committee s investigation. one witness who isn t taking the banner up is donald trump s former chief of staff mark meadows, what we know into that and the war room ingenuous after this. after this it protects the 8 areas dentists check for a healthier mouth. the #1 toothpaste brand in america. crest. practically next door to the
chiefest f, dance giving no who was the presidents chief poster online. how would you characterize the status of their compliance with the subpoenas? i would say that they have been engaging. mr. meadows and mr. patel have engaged with the committee, we have had conversations with their counsel but that s all i would say at this point. then mr. scavino there was a delay in service saying that subpoena, so there was a mutually agreed upon postponement for those deadlines. i would say at this point we are engaged, but nobody is openly defying the subpoena like mr. bannon. that s why is facing this unprecedented step of a full house vote of congress. all right congressman pete aguilar thank you so much. thank you, chris. for his failed covid response
like i said from the beginning the work that the select committee is doing is being done in a nonpartisan way. we want to get to the facts, we owe that the american public, to the brave lawn forsman a vigil to protected this building, and the last line of defense on democracy on that day. we have to get to the facts and wanted to do that, we need to hear from folks. so it is not optional for mr. bannon to shed the subpoena. these are not optional, he has an obligation as anyone should to follow the subpoena. my colleague rachel maddow last night pointed out that the was epa administrator who had been embroiled in a scandal about allegations of misuse of superfund the epa. she was given this criminal complaint by a house that voted unanimously, every single vote of both parties because they
election of the presidential election. if you fast forward to the 2020 election, and allegations of vote fraud that were made there, that could never be proven and it s irresponsible frankly in, my opinion to continue and push the idea that election had a level of fraud that affected the outcome. so that is a guy who is now representing donald trump s chief of staff mark meadows, who we know that the center of all the similar reporting. so that s an interesting choice, one telling four as we continues to develop. he joins me now. congressman, what is the sort of next steps on this complaint ruffle not made it out of the rules committee today? well tomorrow on the afternoon east coast time we will act on it, we will have 60
minutes of debate, and then we will vote on the criminal contempt committee, the select committee passed last evening unanimously. so the full house floor will have a vote on that matter, and after that, after we have the votes to pass that, we will then the speaker will certify, and it will go directly to the united states attorney for the district of columbia. that individual the federal law has the duty to bring it before a federal grand jury. you have obviously two republican votes for it already, the two members that serve on the committee with you list cheney and adam kinzinger, i think there are ten republican votes for impeachment if i recall correctly. do you think you have any more than those two votes for the vote tomorrow? i don t think we have any more than those ten votes. but clearly we have two votes. this is going to be bipartisan,