the past for rulings that she made that were favorable to trump that were overturned. now she s coming under scrutiny for lack of experience when it comes to criminal trials and presiding over them. there s a new york times review that shows she s only overseen four criminal case trials. those cases added up to just 14 trial days. she is currently overseeing a rather extensive trial that pertains to health care where there were a lot of issues that may come up with something like trump s case though. so i wonder what you make of all of this criticism. well, the criticism actually belongs to the nomination process. once the person s now confirmed to be an article 3 judge and is a lifetime ten euroed judge, you have to look ahead to what their responsibilities will be. there s only a limited amount of trial experience in terms of presiding over these ose cases might disadvantage her law clerks who are going to have to help her get up to speed and also make the doj and the defense cou