between house hard liners and the gop establishment. by yesterday leading republican voices were openly calling on house speaker john boehner to back down, to agree to a two-month extension or risk ruining the brand. tonight looking pretty grim he did. doing the right thing for the right reasons is always the right thing to do. while everyone asked for a full year extension of these programs, a lot of people weren t willing to put the effort in as the holidays were approaching to get it done. our members were. so i m proud of the efforts that they put into this. dana is going to join us to explain the mechanics of the deal, the spaks. president obama was quick to praise the outcome. the statement read thg is the real money that will make a real difference in people s lives and i want to thank every american who raised your voice to remind folks in this town what this debate was all about. and to give you an idea of some of the pressure, intense pressure lawmakers were fee
back down, to agree to a two-month extension or risk ruining the brand. tonight looking pretty grim he did. doing the right thing for the right reasons is always the right thing to do. while everyone asked for a full year extension of these programs, a lot of people weren t willing to put the effort in as the holidays were approaching to get it done. our members were. so i m proud of the efforts that they put into this. dana is going to join us to explain the mechanics of the deal, the spaks. president obama was quick to praise the outcome. the statement read thg is the real money that will make a real difference in people s lives and i want to thank every american who raised your voice to remind folks in this town what this debate was all about. and to give you an idea of some of the pressure, intense pressure lawmakers were feeling, take a look at these two entries from rick crawford s web page. the first one is december 20th. the headline reads, quote, crawford rejects
both statements are true. i have a pretty face and i have nothing up stairs. let s go right to north carolina with ber naturaled goldberg.com is standing by with the media s vilification of nancy grace. why do you think that s going on bernie? i have a theory on why it s going on. we are talking about her reporting and performance p we e not critiquing her entire career. i am not as exercised as many critics are. what do they think she is builty of being rude arrogant being a know it all being flamboyant? when does that become a crime on cable television. if that were a crime it would be a bunch of news people in cable tv jail. nancy i am not mentioning any names. good, i am glad you are not. nancy grace sees herself as
of the law? that s what they are saying it is that is the edwards defense. if he got a benefactor or a friend to try to deal with his mistress separately, put them up in their mansion, that s not a campaign violation. having an affair is not a crime it may be embarrassing, it may kill your political career, but if they try to launder that money through the campaign, that s where you get into this criminal situation. you disagree with the prosecutors, the prosecutors are saying anytime you diminish a negative influence on your image if you are just trying to keep quiet something that is going hurt your image in the campaign, that is a campaign expense, per say. that s where elf a problem with this. go ahead, joan, your thoughts. if what is ultimately the case they bring we don t know. that is a hell of an argument excuse me. that is a hell of an argument. that s a hell of an argument. anything that makes you look better is a campaign expense, anything that stops from looking
violation of the law, richard and then joan? is what i described a violation of the law? that s what they are saying it is that is the edwards defense. if he got a benefactor or a friend to try to deal with his mistress separately, put them up in their mansion, that s not a campaign violation. having an affair is not a crime it may be embarrassing, it may kill your political career, but if they try to launder that money through the campaign, that s where you get into this criminal situation. you disagree with the prosecutors, the prosecutors are saying anytime you diminish a negative influence on your image if you are just trying to keep quiet something that is going hurt your image in the campaign, that is a campaign expense, per say. that s where elf a problem with this. go ahead, joan, your thoughts. if what is ultimately the case they bring we don t know. that is a hell of an argument excuse me. that is a hell of an argument. that s a hell of an argument. anything that m