it from their audience because they know that the presentation that is going to be put forward by this bipartisan committee that features two republicans, one of whom has the last name cheney, pretty big republican bona fides there, they know that this is going to be completely devastating, that all of the straw men that they have put up, and false narratives and false flags they have tried to advance will come crumbling down and it will be not by democrat words, not by partisan words but through words and testimony of republicans, of fox news hosts, their text messages and e-mails and depositions. it will all be on full display and it will be irrefutable. go ahead, paul. so, joy, while fox is giving short shrift to the largest federal criminal investigation in u.s. history, we have to note how they love sensational crime coverage of black and brown people. they went all in when the obscure actor jussie smollett was charged with low-level crimes in illinois, but they are
about soft on crime consequences come i mean what does that even mean, right? and so alternate universe on some coverage. ashley: our very own jacqui heinrich pressed jen psaki on criticism of crime coverage. where you is that at all a reflection of the priorities of the administration? speak with the president has been a long time at advocate of addressing crimes. he s never been for defunding the police. addressing crime is something the root of the president s agenda. ashley: the national fraternal order of police demanding the white house official issue an apology. the f.o.p. president writes i think it is wrong, very wrong for jen psaki to suggest violent crime in this country is of no concern or laugh it off. violent crimes are part of some other reality will not help the victims. jen psaki owes him an apology. her comments come as police and first responders become targets.
jen psaki said in that interview about crime coverage that took place last week. take a listen. jeanine pirro is talking about soft on crime consequences. what does that even mean, right? there is an alternate universe on some coverage. talking about crime coverage. when pressed about the sentiment yesterday she was brushing off the notion biden administration has been soft on crime. i m sorry for people who feel i need to be critical but the president has never been for defunding the police. dana: president of the fraternal order of the police sounded off with a statement saying i think it s wrong, very wrong for miss psaki to suggest that violent crime is of no concern or just laugh it off. she may feel safe in the white house one of the most protected buildings in the united states but not everyone feels safe in their workplace. that proved true over a mile
the vaccines. the media decided to completely ignore the former and cover the latter. i think that shows us another sort of bias failure inherent in the news landscape today. howard: and of course even president biden still has not been able to get that 40% of americans who have not got the shots to get vaccinated. more the panel in a moment as we look at crime coverage from kyle whitten house kyle rittenhouse. where everything just seems to go your way. you re in good hands with allstate. click or call for a lower auto rate today. what do we want for dinner? you re in good hands with allstate. burger. i want a sugar cookie. wait. i want a bucket of chicken. i want. it s the easiest because it s the cheesiest. kraft. for the win win.
Maggie Jones Patterson theconversation.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from theconversation.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.