china aiming to reach their peak emissions by then. america s targeting net zero by 2050. china hoping to be carbon neutral a decade after that. but these are promise, not guarantees. within the u.s., energy has become more efficient. about 20% of electricity comes from renewables, like wind and solar. but politics have forged avoiding creating consistent climate solutions. the u.s. has a credibility challenge. there is a lot of just attention on u.s. s domestic political challenges to achieving and fulfilling those climate promises. china for its part tends to under promise and over deliver. reporter: under the all-powerful central government, china s challenge is its size and rapid growth. shanghai, china s most developed city, is home to more than 24 million people. and keeping all of this up and going relies on a constant power supply. in recent decades, china s economy has soared, nearly
(Bloomberg) Reserve Bank of Australia chief Philip Lowe faces a major communications challenge on Tuesday as speculation mounts he will scrap a bond-yield…
about, but president is obviously conflicted himself because on the one and he can use the mueller report s conclusions and non-conclusions to say, see, there s nothing more here to investigate, but on the other hand he is still very angry, and he understands that one of the principal messages that bob mueller was delivering yesterday in personsy didn t say that he didn t commit the crime. to that point the he is a good performer. he has this twitter following. he knows how to use social media. 448 pages can t talk page. the mueller report can t speak back and if you haven t, it therefore, the president dominates the discussion, but if you come down to a credibility test who do you believe between the president of the united states, who routinely lies, sorry, has to say it, and the guy with a purple heart and bronze star and 50 years of service to the country robert mueller wins your credibility challenge and to your point was he essentially said read the report. you ll find plenty
they are obstructionists. so i have people, hundreds of people that were trying to get through. i mean, you see the backlock. you can t get them through. not true. you have to have people i m not saying that the democrats won t i was going to say, i m not saying the democrats won t obstruct them once they get there, but you have to name them first. and this administration hasn t named a lot of people. and in some sectors, it s because they don t agree on who should be named. so until thatinternal issue is revolved, they won t have external issues. is the white house obstructing the state, is the state obstructing the white house? there s a big fight about policy here. and that s why these appointments are not being made. and to the point that russia is noticing. the credibility challenge is also playing out this morning. helping the president with an election in kansas.
the obama administration decided a couple of months ago to send basically rifles and bullets to the rebels, but there isn t any evidence that any of that has arrived yet. we were reporting like a big change of policy but in fact, not much on the ground changed. or nothing on the ground. or nothing. so far for assad there is no price to pay. john, we heard from secretary kerry yesterday, secretary hagel this afternoon, biden this afternoon, is it likely we ll hear from the president before any kind of an attack? in memory, we don t usually hear from a president before the attack. that s a debate within administration and the conversation you re having under scores the credibility challenge for the president right now. there was plans to release more intelligence today, perhaps satellite images, there is a tug of war within the administration over how much to do. we have heard from the prime minister of great britain, we ve heard from the president of