who are you really talkin about? is there someone else that w know like that i m just asking. maybe if he had a restaurant, he would put up classified folders in his restaurant or show them where the nuclear ma is maybe there s nuclear maps, man. nobody gets to be promptin like a nuclear map chris, thank you thank you as always, my friend and thanks to at-home fo joining us this evening. donald trump s questionable fundraising tactics are no exactly a new thing. and i made it that it broke. after all, he s turned his manhattan indictment into moneymaking juggernaut to the tune of $12 million plus looks like he turned his las days in office into a cash bonanza while at the same time trying to subvert democracy. it was pretty ambitious. i mean, some people might just try to steal an election and leave it there but not donald trump the second of january 6t hearing in congress back i june representative low zo lofgren she called it the president trump used the lie he
otherwise? yeah. it s made us a lot closer. every time i signed to him, see a smile on his face. after high school, surely i planning on becoming an as interpreter. for example, i m going to the store. so, how would you sign that i go to store and she s already getting started. i just feel there should be a lot more - out there for people like my brother. it s a sign of what to come rehema ellis, nbc news, ne york thank you to the grea rehema ellis and on that note, i wish you a very good night. from all of our colleagues across the network networks of nbc news, anthks for staying u late i will see you at the end of tomorrow donald trump s questionable fundraising tactics are no exactly a new thing. and i mean if it ain t broke - after all, he s turned his manhattan indictment into moneymaking juggernaut to the tune of $12 million plus just like he turned his last days in office into a cash bonanza while at the same time trying to subvert democracy. it was
standing he has right now with the american public. were they to not throw thi case out on standing it woul further erode public confidenc in the court, i think, from vast number of americans they are certainly aware of certain of the issue of sort of th institutional credibility bein at stake but you have to remember, this is a group of bodies as an institution that considers itself insulated from the rest of the - it sure is. whether that s a realisti view or not, i think you could take issue with it but they certainly do not se themselves subject to the same rules. they don t have an ethics code for a reason so, as much as democrati lawmakers are pounding their fists about this stuff, unless they can figure out this sor of political will to get som sort of a new bill passed, that s not going to be on th table for this court and so, your, justice robert can look at this and say, don t know if this is great fo public confidence. but you have not heard a pee this issue at all
question, there is a lot o news about clarence thomas and his dealings with harlan crow, a wealthy donor. a lot of people have ver negative opinions of thi court. against that backdrop, do yo think that - i mean, do you think tha clarence thomas scandal because that s what i think it is - will affect the way justic roberts chief justice roberts might vote here? because they are aware of th hit, reputation that the court has taken, the sort of tenuous standing it has right now with the american public. were they to not throw thi case out on standing it woul further erode public confidenc in the court, i think, from vast number of americans they are certainly aware of certain of the issue of sort of th institutional credibility bein at stake but you have to remember, this is a group of bodies as an institution that considers itself insulated from the rest of the - it sure is. whether that s a realisti