The presiding officer any senators wishing to cast their vote . The yeas are 45, the nays are 52. The motion is not agreed to. Mr. Barrasso mr. President . The presiding officer the senator from wyoming is recognized. The senate will be in order. Take your conversations out of the chamber. Mr. Barrasso parliamentary inquiry. Is it correct that no the presiding officer the senator cannot be heard. The senate will be in order. Mr. Barrasso mr. President , parliamentary inquiry. Is it correct that no senator is permitted to offer an amendment to this bill while the majority leaders amendment or motions are pending . The presiding officer at this time, there is no place for other amendments on the senators amendment tree, so that is correct. Mr. Barrasso i move to table the reed amendment number 3025, and i ask for the yeas and nays. The presiding officer is there a sufficient second . There appears to be. The clerk will call the roll. Vote vote vote the presiding officer any senators wish
Thank you again for your leadership and the opportunity to be a part of make it in america. And next from the state of pennsylvania, representative cartwright who has introduced the job creation through Energy Efficient manufacturing. Thank you. And thank you all for coming today. I want you to notice a couple things about the people standing before you on this stage. Were all wearing two things. Were wearing our congressional badges and were wearing our make it in america pins. We wear the first because we care about this country. We wear the second because we know that part of caring about this country is caring about making manufacturing jobs resurface in this country. And i thank mr. Hoyer on his leadership and in the make it in america plan, to strengthen businesses and create high paying jobs in this country. Im also gratified to have had hr4162, the job creation through Energy Efficient manufacturing act, added to this program. Energy efficiency is not just about being green, it
The whole may accord priority in recognition of the basis on whether a member offering the amendment has caused it to be printed in a portion of the congressional record designated for that purpose. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. He clerk will read. The clerk be it enacted that the following sums appropriate ffered agriculture, rural development, food and Drug Administration and related Agencies Program for fiscal year 2015, namely, title 1, agricultural programs, production process production, processing and marketing, office of the ecretary, 41,284,000. The chair the clerk will suspend. The gentlewoman from california, for what purpose do you seek recognition . Ms. Lee i have an amendment at the desk. The chair the clerk will designate the amendment. The clerk ms. Lee of california, page 2, line 14, after the first dollar amount insert reduced by 5 million ms. Lee i ask for unanimous consent to dispense with the reading. The chair without objection, the reading is
Coverage continues tonight with the Kansas Senate debate between incumbent republican pat roberts and his independent challenger greg orman. And 00 eastern on cspan. Senator carl levin, chairman of the Armed Services committee, is at the u. S. Institute of peace to talk about u. S. Afghanistan relations. Live coverage starting at 9 30 a. M. Eastern on cspan2. Canpans 2015 Student Competition is underway. It will award 150 prizes totaling 100,000. Create a 57 minute documentary on the topic the three branches and you. Programming,n varying points of view, and submit by january 20, 2015. Grab a camera and get started. Now, the Kansas Senate debate between incumbent republican pat roberts, seeking his fourth term, and independent opponent greg orman. The rotenberg political report the debate is courtesy of the Johnson County Public Policy council and the kansas city tv station kmbc. [applause] thank you. Welcome to all of you. For those of you who are here covering the race from outofstat
If we sacrifice the future, do we really take care of all the past cleanup . We hardly do whats necessary, even with current funding. And so i think its a perfect example of where the sequestration process is so counterproductive and moves america backwards. We have very imperfect choices here, and actually very dangerous choices that we are being forced to make. I think the majority would be much better suited to come back to us with a budget that allows us to do the job that the energy and water subcommittee is charged with doing. We simply cant try to solve the problem internal through the resources weve been given. Its an impossibility, and so somebodys going to be going to lose. Im sure those that came up washington. Ies in the people who are getting water assistance, they just lost money. They got no lobby here. They got none of those people from the various Nuclear Sites to come in here and lobby for them, and yet they just lost out in a prior amendment. They have a right to an