comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Cpa rule 11 - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Lawsuit for Injury While Answering A Spam Phone Call

In Saggio v. Medicredit, the Defendant’s statutory construction leads to the inference Plaintiff injured himself by answering the phone. Given TCPA intent, this argument lacks any merit. A Plaintiff’s harm must be caused by a violation of federal law for Article III standing.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.