Thank you, mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. In 1991, congress enacted the tcpas basic restriction on the placement of automated calls to cell phones. In the years that followed lower courts consistently upheld the constitutionality of that restriction as a contact neutral restriction on the use of calling technologies consumers found particularly intrusive and annoying and the Congress Debt exception in 2015 did not introduce any constitution infirmity into the statutory scheme and that exception is limit to a narrow category of calls that intrude less on Consumer Privacy than the typical automated call and that serve an important counterveiling interest in protecting the federal fisk. Theres been a good deal back and forth in the briefs whether sponedents challenge is properly viewed as one to the exception or to the general automated call restriction. And i think in circumstances like this theres not a right way or wrong way, not a right or wrong challenge to bring, the
Thank you mr. Chief justice and may i please the court. The basic prescription on automated calls to cell phones in the years that followed dave field the constitutionality in the content of natural restriction on the use of calling technologies consumers found particularly intrusive and annoying. Congress enacted the exception in 2015 did not introduce any constitutional infirmity into the statutory scheme that exception is limited to the category of calls that intrude less severely on Consumer Privacy than does the typical automated call into the countervailing interest in protecting. Theres been a good deal of back and forth about whether respondents challenge the exception or the general automated call restriction and in circumstances because therere isnt a right or wrong way. There is simply here we think both challenges could have been both but would fail. Id like to focus first on the challenge the respondent is asserting that is a challenge to the automated restriction into the
Congress did not introduce any constitutional infirmity into the statutory scheme. That exception is limited to a narrow category of calls less severely on Consumer Privacy than does the typical automated call and serve a countervailing interest. Theres been a good deal of backandforth about whether responding to challenges exceptioniewed as the or the general automated call. I think in steer circumstances like this is not a wrong way or wrong way, there simply two conceptually distinct analytical ways of challenging a law that includes a basic prescription. Here we think both challenges couldve been brought in both would fail. Id like to focus on the asserting,hich it is the challenge respondents are asking the court to focus on. The challenge on the automated call restriction. The theory is the government exception taken in combination with other aspects of the statutory scheme prevents the automated call restriction from performing its Consumer Protection function. The firstld under
Of the top of russias war. Criminal propagandist will all be hunted down and justice will be served. Russia launch is approved into the threats made against journalist by the spokesperson for the free military law school polls for international condemnation. The west side of the american billionaire recommends people keep cash instead of investing in Us Government policies. As they may not, the problem must go to the world. This is our take, great to have your company today. My names youve been over 11 followers and people have lost their lives in flood ravaged libya according to the red crescent age group, of wherever, as the expense of the devastation is own, covered more and more officials, one, the grand total may almost double the storm retail back on various areas in eastern vf notes, i believe at ton of some, some recent footage from the area reveal damage buildings on infrastructure. We spoke to a survivor there who described what happened to him actually has a lot of waves sur
Recess at any time. Or attribute of maintaining sovereignty is to maintain and control our borders. This failure has allowed millions of foreign nationals to enter the u. S. Illegally an narcotics to enter our country illegally. It is time to secure the border. Essential issues of the president s 2006 campaign was the promise to build and impenetrable physical tall beautiful southern border wall. The administration is taking steps to fulfill the promise and the subcommittee on National Security is closely monitoring this process. The president issued an executive order on january 25 with the department of Homeland Security to take all appropriate steps to immediately plan, design and construct a physical wall along the border. On march 17 dhs requested to request for proposals as the first step in fulfilling the requirements. Dhs is expected to use the prototypes to inform actual construction. Border walls have seen success in recent years. They have. [inaudible] the construction of th