they re asking the 11th circuit for that. plus, doj is saying they shouldn t have to turn over that classified material to trump s legal team or even the special master who s been appointed for this review. they re saying that the lower court judge was just wrong to order the disclosure of some of this highly sensitive material in the midst of this ongoing investigation. on a broader scale, the doj is saying courts shouldn t be stepping in on this issue because all of the documents at issue belong to the government. they say, allowing the government to use and review the records bearing classification markings for criminal investigative purposes would not cause any injury to plaintiff. that being donald trump. plaintiff has no property or other legal interest this those records. plaintiff has identified no cognizable harm for allowing investigators to continue to review and use the same subset of the seized records.
think that is treating something that may not even really be a disease. for example, we don t know, has the vice president had this before? she has been vaccinated four times so she has a decent amount of immunity, she does not have any symptoms i don t think giving her a 300 other treatment is a good idea. i agree with you the monoclonal antibodies for life-saving and they taken them off the market because the biden administration owns them all and you can them. it is difficult to find them now. sean: you actually can get eli lilly but you have to search high and low and in most cases, you only get them from a concierge service that does this. unless you are incredibly high risk or symptom addict, i don t think treating everybody before they get symptoms is a good idea. i do think fauci s nonsense over whether the pandemic has ended or not, when you see him come out, he basically has said courts shouldn t be involved with limiting his power, what he is saying basically as he is ag
treatment. i think that is treating something that may not even really be a disease. so for example, we don t know as the vice president had this before, she d been vaccinated for time. so vacci she has a decent amounn immunity if she s not going to have any symptoms. i don t think givinges a three hundred dollar treatment is a good idea. idea. i agree with you. the monoclonal antibodies are lifesaving and they ve taken them off the market becauseng the bio demonstration owns them all and you can t buy them. it s f very difficult to find them now if you actually getan lily, but you have to searche high and low and in most casesas you ll only get ites from a concierge s service that does it. butt unless you re incredibly high risk or you re symptomatic, i don t think treating everybody before they get any symptomss is a good idea. i do think though that falsies sort of nonsense over whether h the pandemics ended or not when you see him come out and he basically has said that the courts
you re not even waiting for it. was that a mistake to bypass the litigation phase? i don t think so. if you go back and review what the president has done, the subpoenas that he s ignored at every level, the white house, the office of management and budget, the state department as well as the department of defense, they ve simply ignored all the subpoenas. how do you get those enforced? you ve got to go through the courts. that could take forever and a day. the information that was available in the witnesses that did testify both in the evidentiary process of the intelligence committee and then before the full judiciary committee, it is very, very clear that the president engaged in an extortion, in a bribe trying to get ukraine to put information forward, false as it might be, to somehow help him in the campaign.
word on this. the republicans and defenders of the president are arguing right now that courts shouldn t make a decision about mcgahn and by extension other cases because they would be in fact weighing in on an impeachment argument. they re having it both ways. it not fair. but you are fair to be on the show and make your case, i love you for it. thank you, jennifer rodgers, always a pleasure to have you here. the best to your families for the holidays. tricky jimmy. you, too, chris. could impeachment help the president politically? we re seeing the suggestion of that in numbers. it worth looking at. what are the risks, what is the exposure? how do these three fine mind see it? we ll get the breakdown next. s. now with 25% more concentrated power. nothing works faster for powerful cold relief. oh, what a relief it is! so fast!