to make less of this would be to televise it, so people can say for themselves. since you mentioned chief justice john roberts, it s ultimately him and the judicial conference who will make that decision. but do you believe, given the way that the supreme court has behaved and the way the chief justice has behaved it, in the lack of transparency when it comes to the supreme court, that he d be willing to grant that transparency to the american public in this trial? i certainly hope he would. i don t think he wants the court to have a good reputation. some of the things the court has done has lost its support for the public, with the no ethics laws, and all the benefits that have been heaped upon clarence thomas and justice alito, getting similar benefits. and acting like it s improper even to question the ethics of the supreme court. they should not be a medium for ethics laws like every other political group is. so yeah, i hope justice roberts will protect the courts
so yeah, i hope justice roberts will protect the courts integrity, and the court is at a low point, i think it s acceptance by the public would be abnormal for him to do this, to say the public has a right to see this at different times. if we didn t even have television, there s news reels, i guess, but he didn t have a president like trump. we didn t have a division of this country the way it is, where people, you can t see the truth, and listen to what they are told by folks that think democrats are all running pizza restaurants with fronts to have human trafficking and child trafficking going on. they believe this qanon mess. this is a dangerous time in our nation. i think justice roberts need to recognize, the court needs to take extraordinary action to protect the democracy and protect the foundations on which the court rests. yeah, in his previous scholars and others who have study this have noted, televising the trials has not impacted either the jurors or the right of a de
or state legislatures. but she is espousing this very controversial theory. and many argue that given the closeness that she shares with her husband, and how they frequently talked about how they share many of the same views, that it is likely something that he believes as well. and so that resists the question, regardless of what happens with regard to the january six select committee, and those questions that come out, when it case comes up to the court indicating this independent elect just fletcher doctrine, justice views may also really be noted are reflected in those emails from his wife. and by rights, he likely should recuse himself from that case. but of course the supreme court is not required to recuse themselves on any sort of issues, they do so as a matter of prudence not by requirement. and maybe very unlikely that justice thomas refuses himself. but he was the one, just a few weeks, ago saying that the courts integrity had vigilant by the leak. this also seems to be some