rubio or trump? this is very much the problem. when it suits ted politically, he s on one side. the problem that we have here, very clearly that s unfair. have you looked at his website? go to ted cruz.org. what do you see? you can t just make it up. i read the entire plan. have you read it? don t change the subject. here it is. it s very clear. we ve all seen the courtroom dramas where they say, are you lying then or lying now? if ted wants to go with the idea this was a poison pill amendment, that s fine. all he has to confess to is that he lied back then when he he doesn t have to confess to a thing. what are you talking about? when he spoke to all those groups and said he wanted to build a path, if the goal was to get it to pass, either ted lied then or lying now. any supporter has to come to grips with the fear that if he lied then, he may be lying now.
middle? and who is he close to? rubio or trump? he will be on one side when it suits him and he ll be on the other side. that s completely unfair. have you even looked at his website. go to tedcruz.org, what do you see? 11 pages on immigration reform i was quiet and polite let me speak. have you read it? i ve read the entire thing. don t change the subject. we ve all seen those courtroom dramas where they say to the witness, were you lying then or are you lying now? if ted cruz and his surrogates want to go with the idea this is a poison pill amendment, that s fine. all he has to confess to is he lied back then he doesn t have to confess to anything. what are you talking about? when he spoke to all those groups and said he wanted the bill to pass and the goal was to get it passed, either ted was lying then or he s lying now. any supporter has to come grips
terrorism. the session is about to resume. you see the chairman there in the middle of the screen. hillary clinton is now back in the hearing room. some of her other senior advisers as well. we re told she s been preparing for this session for days now, if not weeks anticipating the questions and so far she s been very calm and collected in the course of some pretty tough questioning. and let s remember that the whole point of congressional testimony, whether it s democrats in the majority or republicans, the whole point is, obviously, to have these big moments like in courtroom dramas where somebody admits the truth or somebody loses their cool. that s often when members of congress are trying to get the witnesses to do. and secretary clinton so far has
as they say in courtroom dramas, you re leading the witness. correct. feinstein summarized the report on the floor today. the committee found that the cia s coercive interrogation techniques were not an effective means of acquiring intelligence or gaining detainee cooperation. we took 20 examples that the cia itself claimed to show the success of these interrogations. our staff reviewed every one of the 20 cases. and not a single case holds up. actionable intelligence that was, quote, otherwise unavailable. otherwise unavailable. was not obtained using these coercive interrogation techniques. well, according to senator feinstein, in most cases, the
Transcripts for CNN CNN Spotlight 20140618 05:54:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.