Interference charges. Now, i will remind you, the court could have just affirmed the u. S. District courts ruling that, no, a president ial does not have absolute immunity. But that was not the decision tonight. And while hearing the case does not mean that ultimately they will rule in trumps favor, the highest court in the land just gave trump something that he has been aggressively fighting for, time. The Oral Arguments in the case have been set for the week of april 22nd, nearly two months from now. Why so much time . And after that, even in a best case scenario, it will be a few weeks before a decision comes down. That is the best case considering we know that there are at least some of the Supreme Court justices who dont agree with the earlier rulings. Otherwise, they would not be hearing the case. And if the court does decide to affirm the earlier ruling, as they should, and hand the case back to District Court judge tanya chutkan, she would need a few months to get the case back
Doctrine or keep it. Chief Justice Roberts well hear argument first this morning in case 221219, relentless versus the department of commerce. Mr. Martinez. Oral argument of Roman Martinez on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court for too long, chevron has distorted the judicial process and undermined statutory interpretation. It should be overruled for three reasons. First, chevron violates the constitution. Article iii empowers judges to say what the law is. It requires them to interpret federal statutes using their best and independent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reallocates Interpretive Authority from courts to agencies, and it forces courts to adopt inferior agency constructions that are issued for political or policy reasons. In doing so, chevron blocks judges from serving as faithful agents of congress. It mandates judicial bias and encourages agency overreach. And by removing key checks on executive power, it threatens i
Prepared a draft law numbered 1115 on the regulation of the activities of shared access platforms, which have already been dubbed the telegram ban law, but the author himself explains that it is about all social networks that distribute information as media and the draft law does not provide for any prohibitions. Lets listen to what knyazhytsky said. Actively use our social networks. Someone for the objective normal information, someone to manipulate public opinion, because you can write any lie on anyone and not bear any responsibility for it, and no one can settle it, not even the court, because he does not know who wrote it, neither who owns the network that this is written on, nor the regulators, and the law does not propose to ban anyone, all that the law proposes is that. Such a network, which is essentially a mass media, open a representation in ukraine or the countries of the european union, communicated with the national regulator, that is, from the National Council of televis
Ukraine, but also for the whole world, because together with the condemnation of the terrorist regime of putin , the world, and the orthodox world, must also give an assessment to the Russian Orthodox church and its head, patriarch gundyaev, because you cannot change concepts, you cannot say white for black , cannot be constantly manipulated. And use faith as a tool, one of the tools for the destruction of the ukrainian people. Another tool that is quite actively used by the russians in the fight against the ukrainians, it is the telegram messenger, which was created by former russians, however, there are no former russians, i do not believe that there are former russians, and this was confirmed by. The head of the Main Intelligence Department of the ministry of defense, Kyrylo Budanov , who spoke during the kyivstatcom forum, and he said that the Telegram Network in many ways has a destructive effect inside the country, but at the same time it allows information to be delivered to peo
Including 92 artillery units equipment only in the zaporizhzhia direction , against 19, documented, confirmed ukrainian artillery systems, these are the numbers they call, that is, it is about one to five, at least in the zaporizhzhia direction, and many, michael kofman, in particular an authoritative american expert believes that what is actually happening is gradually being forged tactically, but the most important advantage is precisely in the artillery systems, and by the way, everyone who joined us today all noted that plusminus parity in terms of shells, in terms of firepower , it is already established, despite the fact that the russians continue to hit the square, well, ours continue to hit them with aim, well, lets explain what we are talking about, we are talking about the successful nature of the counterbagaatary struggle, due to tactical and technical characteristics, western weapons that are in service with the armed forces, eh, the range of damage compared to the russian