2020 election. we re still not done. an nbc news analysis finds jack smith s grand jury has interviewed dozens of witnesses from little known campaign aides to the former vice president of the united states. and smith s questions are, quote, focused particularly on the fake elector scheme. smith is also said to be focused on that unhinged december 18th oval office meeting about seizing voting machines. the meeting was full of insults and conspiracy theory, concerning powell, michael flynn. here s how the people in the room described that december 18th meeting. someone screamed at me that i was a quitter, kept on standing up and turning and around screaming at me. they were fighting. the first thing i walked in and i looked at them and said who are you? people fighting with each other and hurling insults at each other. what they were proposing i thought was nuts. how nuts was it? this was the draft executive or they were pushing trump to sign: it was not written
trump. so that was kind of a key theory in seven different states in the 2020 election, propose these fake slates of electors. and notably this case that i just argued, moore versus harper, in the u.s. supreme court court solidly put to rest any notion that this is a viable legal theory whatsoever. it wasn t viable anyway. maybe you can get a person like john eastman to say it, but nobody in their right mind believed this. we live in a democracy after all. josh, so when i hear about the sort of chaotic meetings and this is one of the beauties of last year s hearings, like we saw these men and women sitting there stone faced saying, yeah, i don t know why the heck i was here, this meeting doesn t make any sense one way or another, yet they were all participating. looking at this now and where jack smith and going, do you expect more people who were testifying last year to the