one, whether it runs to a former president, even in circumstances where the current president disagrees about whether the privilege should run to this person. and then, of course, the whole question implicates an earlier decision of the court, trump versus mazars decided in june 2020. that case concerned the scope of congress authority to seek documents from a sitting president. and so the question here that the president former president trump has raised is that the current select committee has actually abused the latitude the court prescribed to it in that case by going further than that case would have allowed. wow. it s just absolutely fascinating to contemplate all of this. there s also some new reporting in the hill which suggests that president biden could find himself under pressure to expand the supreme court. more so, if the court rolls back abortion rights when it decides to mississippi s abortion ban. constitutionally speaking, how does this work? given the country s s