And hence constitutional. And more clearly qualified immunity applies. Lets turn to the totality of the circumstances. Before you do that. Could you qualify the other charges that are in the case. The one that led to Disorderly Conduct. And negligence supervision. Where do they stand . Are they in in way affected by the argument youre making today . We do not pursue and an argument that probably cause existed for Disorderly Conduct. Negligence and supervision that common law claim fails. If there was either probable cause or qualified immunity. Thats where they stand. If i may turn to the circumstances. My clients responded today neighbors complaints about. Im not sure i understood what you said. Whether we hold unqualified immunity ground or probable cause grounds i dont think is affects the claim, does it . Why would our finding of probably cause affect it. I think the stand on their own. No, your honor. If there was probable cause the negligence supervision would fail. That was indi
And more clearly qualified immunity applies. Lets turn to the totality of the circumstances. Before you do that. Could you qualify the other charges that are in the case. The one that led to Disorderly Conduct. And negligence supervision. Where do they stand . Are they in in way affected by the argument youre making today . We do not pursue and an argument that probably cause existed for Disorderly Conduct. Negligence and supervision that common law claim fails. If there was either probable cause or qualified immunity. Thats where they stand. If i may turn to the circumstances. My clients responded today neighbors complaints about. Im not sure i understood what you said. Whether we hold unqualified immunity ground or probable cause grounds i dont think is affects the claim, does it . Why would our finding of probably cause affect it. I think the stand on their own. No, your honor. If there was probable cause the negligence supervision would fail. That was indisputed. Well let your adve
D. H. S. Accountability enforcement act. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of the bill. The clerk h. R. 4038, a bill to amend the Homeland Security act of 2002 to reassert article i authorities over the department of Homeland Security, and for ther purposes. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from texas, mr. Mccaul, and the gentleman from texas, mr. Vela, each will control 20 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from texas. Mr. Mccaul mr. Speaker, i ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days to revise and including r remarks, any extraneous materials on the bill under consideration. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Mccaul mr. Speaker, i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore time yielded. Mr. Mccaul thank you. Mr. Speaker, i rise today in strong support of bipartisan d. H. S. Accountability enhancement act. Mr. Speaker, the current threats confronting our homeland co
Good morning, it is a pleasure to be sitting here with my. Olleagues welcome toxtended this to the distinguished to argue their cases and to our observers. Numberly case, which is 3598 is submitted on briefs. 15395 46. Se, number the first case for oil argument for oral argument is the state of hawaii versus trump. To 1715589. Minutese is set for 30 per side on the oral argument. Please watch your time and try to sum up when the timer is yellow and stop when it is red. The courts add that aware of the importance of this case. We will add extra time if one of the fields you need it need to present your argument. Certainly if either of my colleagues have questions, once the time is up we will go forward. I will also tell the group that after the first cases it is ued there will be a recess we like to exit the courtroom. Thereafter the 20 minute recess we will continue with the other cases. Will now turn to the right versus trump. Will now turn to the right versus trump. Cannot stand for
Good morning, it is a pleasure to be sitting here with my. Olleagues welcome toxtended this to the distinguished to argue their cases and to our observers. Numberly case, which is 3598 is submitted on briefs. 15395 46. Se, number the first case for oil argument for oral argument is the state of hawaii versus trump. To 1715589. Minutese is set for 30 per side on the oral argument. Please watch your time and try to sum up when the timer is yellow and stop when it is red. The courts add that aware of the importance of this case. We will add extra time if one of the fields you need it need to present your argument. Certainly if either of my colleagues have questions, once the time is up we will go forward. I will also tell the group that after the first cases it is ued there will be a recess we like to exit the courtroom. Thereafter the 20 minute recess we will continue with the other cases. Will now turn to the right versus trump. Will now turn to the right versus trump. Cannot stand for