The republicans have doubled down on their claims of u. S. Election fraud but with little extra details of their claims is what the White House Press secretary had to say about the Democratic Party and their response to the election they have taken a Global Pandemic and turned it into a nationwide electoral epidemic they have taken based on what they call a Natural Disaster if you use that and turn this into a National Disaster and fisher joins us live from washington d. C. Do the republican claims hold water. We still got to see evidence that thats the issue that theyve had since they started making these claims they have got anecdotal evidence theyve got hear see evidence but they havent produced any hard evidence that they could take to a court for example in the valley they say theyve got 3000 names of people who voted in nevada but moved out of the state no thats not on usual there are many military families in the voter who might have been moved but had registered to vote in the
Good morning, welcome, judge. Welcome to all my colleagues. It is a long day but i thought a productive day. We have 20 minute rounds and hopefully we can be done in time before dinner tonight and we will plow ahead and have a few breaks along the way. So, a couple observations from yesterday. Theres an opportunity here to thinkinghe nominees to the extent she can share her thoughts without deciding a particular case that comes before her. Senator harris who are respect suggested you were not candid and judge barrett, i could not disagree more. I have been here for a few of these, i have voted for every nominee that has come before the committee. They have one thing in common, all of you are highly qualified, cape will people. I saw that in just a sotomayor and Justice Kagan submitted by president obama. Definitely did not share their legal philosophy, i expected them to be fairly solid votes for the liberal side of the court and generally speaking, they have been, that they have done
Law and constitution. That yourwn us judicial method is rigorous but also fair and openminded. Above all, it is clear that you understand the appropriate role of a judge, just what we are looking for, at least, on the side of the aisle. An individual who will interpret the law, not want to make it. You are an outstanding candidate. A couple things before i ask my questions. Many of my colleagues on the other side have tried to get you to tell us how you would rule on a case. Case wasou believe a correctly decided. Or rather you will commit to uphold a specific law. Responded, it is not appropriate for you or any nominee in your position, for any level of the judiciary to make promises or give hints on how you would rule or what you think about a potential issue that may,. That may come up. Judicial independence, those are our political branches accountable to the people. A bedrock principle of our constitutional system. Best, aginsburg said it judge is sworn to decide noartially and ca
Television company as a Public Service and brought to you today by your television provider. Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett was back on capitol hill free third day in a row to answer another round of questions at her confirmation hearing. This time, Committee Members had up to 20 minutes each to question judge barrett on her legal philosophy and other issues including abortion, Voting Rights and the Affordable Care act. Good morning, welcome, judge. Welcome to all my colleagues. It is a long day but i thought a productive day. We have 20 minute rounds and hopefully we can be done in time before dinner tonight and we will plow ahead and have a few breaks along the way. So, a couple observations from yesterday. Theres an opportunity here to thinkinghe nominees to the extent she can share her thoughts without deciding a particular case that comes before her. Senator harris who are respect suggested you were not candid and judge barrett, i could not disagree more. I have been here
Unfiltered view of government. Created by americas Cable Television companies as a Public Service and brought to you today by your television provider. Nominee amyourt Coney Barrett was back on capitol hill for a third day in a row to answer another round of questions at her confirmation hearing. This time, Committee Members had up to 20 minutes each to question judge merrick on her judge barrett on her legal philosophies and other issues. Good morning, welcome, judge. Welcome to all my colleagues. It is a long day but i thought a productive day. We have 20 minute rounds and hopefully we can be done in time before dinner tonight and we will plow ahead and have a few breaks along the way. So, a couple observations from yesterday. Theres an opportunity here to thinkinghe nominees to the extent she can share her thoughts without deciding a particular case that comes before her. Senator harris who are respect suggested you were not candid and judge barrett, i could not disagree more. I hav