Chart form. It is more in footnotes. Thank you. We can do more with that, i agree. Thank you very much to our andlists from near and far my colleagues from the institute and you all of you who have come here today. It was a very interesting commentary on where we are and what might be in our future. Thank you very much. [applause] cspans washington journal, live every day with news and policy issues that impact you. Morning, Deputy Managing Editor for the Weekly Standard on the latest developments in campaign 2016, including the rift between donald trump and Many Republican leaders, nationwide. She will also talk about womens attitudes towards mr. Trump. Jesse moore from up from rock the vote will discuss their efforts to reach millennial voters and ways to get them to the polls on election day. Will discuss challenges facing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau following this weeks decision by a federal Appeals Court that the bureaus structure is unconstitutional. She will also ta
Skiers and borders raise the roof. A new season begins today. A basin opened up a couple hours ago. Reporter its a cold morning this morning but the people are starting to get excited. The Black Mountain express is running. People are about to take their first turns. We operating office, with us. We are glad to get things going. Weve had great weather. A lot of people are showing up. I just took a couple runs. The snow is fantastic. Its your 70th year, is that right . Yes, 70 this december. We are excited to celebrate that. There is a lot of great ski history. I am sure you didnt get lines like this in 1946. The season as there will be today. So its a little bit different. Whats exciting about opening day for you . I just like seeing the whole thing start up again, seeing those familiar faces, seeing the guests, the smiles, seeing our employees pull the whole thing together to get the place ready to go. Its just a really fun exciting time. Wonderful, thank much, allen. A basin beat lov
Blog a lot. We have demographic information about our readers as most websites do. We have a relationship with them exclusive write content for their users, their subscribers. But the principal focus is heyve made a judgment that advertising Bloomberg Law on scotus law has economic value. Social ey think its a good. You cant lose sight of the fact that bloomberg made a decision for this was something good the country. They may be right, they may be wrong. Calculus. Part of the theyre unbelievably good to us. This is another unusual thing about a sponsor. They give us money and they ask nothing of us. Thats a remarkable relationship to have. Sponsored by ings Bloomberg Law. Try and highlight what it occasionally. They have decided to finance this operation. Numbers is not something i want to discuss contractual e relationship. But yes, it does finance the existence. They dont put constraints on us so long as the people understand the blog itself is exclusively sponsored by them. What ot
Decision, how it came about. But it just never happens. Think that it probably was either a justice or injustice is relative because nobodys going to discipline them for talking to the press, but it law clerk it could really be a career ending move for a law clerk to talk to the press and give that kind of information. Why did it happen this time . I think the emotions were so , there was so much there were a lot of conspiracy theories especially when the decision did come out and it seemed so anomalous for the court to declare the affordable on onet constitutional part of the constitution and constitutional under another part, i think people were looking for the explanation behind these behind this particular decision. My suspicion is that it was a justice or injustice is a close relative. I will ask pete to jump in. Why arent you getting stories like this on a regular basis . Lets keep our eye on the ball here. The sort of scoops that one values from the Justice Department is what th
Tom had a whole lot of credibility even before the blog started as a Supreme Court advocate. I first started writing about tom when he was a clerk, when he was interning for nina tote 10 berg at n 3 r. As on npr. As an up start, somebody who did not fit the mold as pete said and who was cold calling, the losers of cases in lower courts to see if they wanted to appeal to the Supreme Court, was a model that really hadnt been used before. I remember interviewing another top advocate of the, before the Supreme Court and asked him about tommy and he said, well, you know you wouldnt want your heart surgery done by the, by the heart surgeon who called you up and asked if he could do it. Who was that . That was a fellow by the name of john roberts who became a chief justice. I think he is sort of eating his words on that. So i think, tom had the reputation of a real innovator within this stuffy world of the Supreme Court and he was a good media source. So that when the blog came along i think