during interrogation by italian police following the murder. meredith kirsch are was found half naked with 40 stab wounds. police searched the blood-stained apartment, and arrested the american and the man she had been dating for a week. they would spend four year behind bars, face three jury trials and she would testify of being hit by police, her interrogation without a lawyer. one of the lawyers gave me a smack and said, remember, remember, she told the court today. she was finally freed and exonerated by italy s highest court, the real killer has served a 13-year sentence. for amanda knox, no end to what she calls a nightmare. what is the next step on appeal? we have the right to appeal, but this is a court of appeals decision. before making the decision, i would like to real more.
Tight a leash will there be on that timeframe so that he cant play out the clock. Neal, you have argued, you spent a lot of time in the Supreme Court, arguing cases, thinking about the Supreme Court. A lot of time. What is your thought on here and what could happen . I dont think the Supreme Court is likely to hear the case, jen. I mean, trumps claims are so unhinged that the president can do whatever he wants and murdered people with Seal Team six, this is crazy. The Supreme Court i dont think is going to have much appetite for this. So im looking for three things. Im looking for the rationale of the court of appeals decision, the timing of the court of appeals decision, and then technically, do they stay the mandate . Do they allow the March 4th Trial Date to proceed as is . Im suspecting that theyre going to do all of those things, and basically closely to what Judge Chutkan found already, which means that this trial its doubtful at this moment. Based on such a
court. a lot of time. what is your thought on here and what could happen? i don t think the supreme court is likely to hear at the case, john. i mean, trump s claims are so unhinged that the president can do whatever he wants and murdered people with seal team six, this is crazy. the supreme court i don t think is going to have much appetite for this. so i m looking for three things. i m looking for the rationale of the court of appeals decision, the timing of the court of appeals decision, and then technically, do they stay the mandate? do they allow the march 4th trial date to proceed as is? i m suspecting that they re going to do all of those things, and basically hugh closely to what judge chutkan found already, which means that this trial it s doubtful at this moment. sometimes
with karen fill filippo. i remember whet katelyn and team broke this news, that there was this warrant. now she s got it. 500 pages of this back and forth. you mentioned dms might be a part of it. this is a former president who didn t text and did not email. apparently there s a voluminous amount of direct messages, some of which were deleted, others that had confidential information that were in this account. we had some idea this might be in here just from the court of appeals decision, referring to twitter having said they didn t want to give out this morning, that the cat was out of the back, that they were obtaining direct messages between him and another party that are not public on twitter. that said, the time scale for the search warrant means this is not just around january 6th. it s much broader than that. it s soaking up a lot of information that the government must have had probable cause,
in return for the $6 billion it was going to turn over to help relieve some of the victims needs, that the condition was that the sacklers could not be liable for any future claims. any opioid-related civil claims. what the solicitor general of the united states said was that kind of deal was unprecedented, exceptional, and would not conform to u.s. bankruptcy code. here is part of what she told the court allowing the court of appeals decision, which endorsed the bankruptcy judge to stand, would leave in place a road map for wealthy corporations and individuals to misuse the bankruptcy system to avoid mass tort liability. now, purdue pharma countered by saying to the justices, hoping they would not intervene, the plan will provide billions of dollars to life-saving benefits to the victims, but those funds