Translating the values of the fifth amendment to the modern age. The fifth amendment, concerned about thought crimes, not exerting psychological pressure. He ended by quoting my hero about how government is the omnipotent teacher and you can see that in his letter he thought the court has to be a shining emblem for what Human Dignity needs. We heard the chief justice you can do the best job you could in the context of the law. Time will affect decisions. Youre suggesting its time for us to rethink the technology i think it is. I think miranda could be updated and could be more effective. There were at the love people thinking about this and hopefully, we can all come together and try to think about things like body cameras, video taping and interrogations. Other things that would update miranda. Thanks to both of you for being here tonight on our 11 of 12 cases in the landmark cases series. We appreciate your insight from the miranda case. Thank you so much for being in our audience to
Racial classifications contradicts the 14th andments guarantee of equal treatment. It relied upon sah typical assumptions that race is necessarila proxy for ones viewpoint and its purported limi are empty and selfcontradictory, which is why it also creates many negativeem. Effects. Some applicants are instanof eyes to concear race. Others admitted on merit have their accomplishments diminished by saying celayed a role in their admission. In two decades, this has somehow reduced thro of race on campus. Mr. Strawbridge, the respondents are at if you dont consider race, you wont be able toonder the whole person in the admissions process. How do you respond to that . This court has always said that racial, it is possible that re uld provide context for experience, but just ering race and race alone is not consistent with the constitution. Is also not consistent with other holistic approaches at this court takes. There is great freedom, for example to strike a juro but one thing you cannot
Racial classifications contradicts the 14th amendments guarantee of equal treatment. It relied upon sarah typic assumptions that race is necessarily a proxy r ones viewpoint and its purported limits are emp and selfcontradictory, which is why you and see simply ignores them. It also creates many negative effects. Some applicants are instant of eyes to conceal their ra. Others admitted on merit have their accomplishments diminished by saying race playea le in their admission. In two decades, this has somehow reduced the role of n campus. Mr. Strawbridge, the respondents argue that iyo dont consider race, you wont be able to consider e ole person in the admissions process. How do you respond to that . This court has always said that racial, it is possible that race could ove context for experience, but just considerinra and race alone is not consistent with the constitution. It is ot consistent with other holistic approaches that this court takes. Therisreat freedom, for example to strik
Days proceed stion approved. The proceedings is approved. The chair will lead the house in the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of america and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Pursuant to section 1 of House Resolution 1230, the house stands adjourned until noon on thursday, november 3, 2022. To bclear, unc would like nothing more than to achieve its educational aims through race neral means. It has taken extensive efforts to do so and seen steady and continuing progress towa this goal. But this progress has been halting and the university retains a powerful interest in preventing the backsliding that would occur if thisourt took away the power to decide its import social policy issue from people of North Carolina. I look forward to questions. Mr. Park,ve heard the word diversity quite a few times and i dont have a clue what it s. Sms to mean everything for evyone. I would