Good afternoon and welcome to the San Francisco board of supervisors for the meeting of tuesday, september 27, 2016. Mme. Clerk, can you please call the roll. Thank you mme. Pres. [roll call] thank you. Mme. Pres. You have a quorum. Thank you. Can you please join us in a pledge to the flag. [pledge of allegiance] thank you mme. Clerk, are there any communications . I have none to report. We have a motion by supervisor ali lows and seconded by supervisor peskin can we take this without objection . Without objection, this motion passes. On items one through 21. [roll call vote] there are 10 ayes. Okay, those items are passed on the First Reading and adopted unanimously. Mme. Clerk, the first item. Item 22 is an ordinance ordinance appropriating 77,000,000 of proceeds from the general obligation housing bond, series 2016f to the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development for public housing, lowIncome Housing, investment in mission neighborhood, and middle Income Housingdalp and tn
Party chairmen of the i would find it i would be shocked if the court which is not a necessary and says it has to be total population in this case. They dont need to decide that to resolve this case. They can leave it open. If it becomes a problem they can reach it at some later time. Questions from the press. My question is for hashim. You kept saying voters and suggested [inaudible] arent asking for voters or are they asking for citizen voting age population . The cameras are asking that if you have questions come to the mic. Its not being picked up. Im sorry. I will mumble it now. You kept saying voters and suggested, for example, that prisons in rural areas would not be counted because they are felons. But are they asking for voters that are literally eligible to vote or of asking for citizen age voting population . Results are different. So the brief is a little come the plaintiffs a brief vessel agnostic about. As i read it there focus on eligible voters. There are a lot of diffe
Because if they dont, we cant then use their plans to provide the coverage that we want to provide. Now, you can still have a debate about whether that is the least restrictive means of doing all this, but i dont see really how you can have a debate at that point about whether there is a substantial burden on religion because youre comipelling peope do something and if they dont, they have to pay millions of dollars this penal ciin penalti. Every court below that has gone the other way. Im not sure the government will fair nearly as well before the Supreme Court on that piece. But we shall see. Im agreeing with you that to the extent it turns on the fact of the government providing information, but i dont think the governme cases turn on that. Ill turn then to the press. Questions. Yeah. Will atmospherics on kim davis affect the justices thoughts on this . Kim davis is raising a claim under the kentucky state rifra. Her case is obviously a little different because shes a public officia
October 1, 2015, snul city , city of San Francisco government audit and Oversight Committee please stand by. Good morning. The meeting will come to order. This is a special meeting of the government audit and Oversight Committee for october 1, 2015, im supervisor yee, chair of this committee, joined by supervisor london breed and Supervisor John Avalos the committee would like to acknowledge the staff of sf govtv and bill dylan who record each of our meetings and make the transcript available online. Before i continue may i get a motion to excuse supervisor christensen . No objections. Motion passes. Madam clerk, any announces. City clerk please turn off all cell phones and any electronic devices. Items for the file should be submitted. Items will appear on the agenda unless otherwise stated. Supervisor norman yee madam clerk please call items 1 and 2 together. City clerk [resolution urging the rejection of Priority Enforcement Program] sponsors campos; avalos and mar resolution opposi
May or may not need to be revisited. One of those policies that came out during this discussion that i do believe needs to be revisited and i do believe needs to be rescinded. Fs sheriffs gag order that made him the last authority whether his department would communicate at all with federal immigration authorities. So on no. 2 there is a resolution that does three things. One, it confirmation this boards support for our existing sanctuary city law which has been a pilar of our Law Enforcement policy and Public Safety policy in San Francisco for decades. It also confirmation our support for the due process legislation that supervisor avalos sponsored in 2013. And third, calls on the sheriff because he asked for direction to rescind the memo that he issued this march 13, 2015, which amounted to the gag order on his department. One of the important pilars of our sanctuary city policy and its codified in federal law is referencing personnel Law Enforcement to give information to these enti