barr so i accepted what he said, was saying. reporter: all describes what happened in their own words, and making it clear that right from the beginning, donald trump was told the truth. i thought, boy, if he really believes this stuff, he has, you know, lost contact with with he s become detached from reality. reporter: but donald trump was so adamant about staying in power the committee showed he would try to overturn the election the only way we re going to lose this election is if the election is rigged remember that. reporter: he tried to do it through lawsuits 61 cases lost, half thrown out and in no instance did a court find that the charges of fraud were real. reporter: he tried to do it through pressure on the states leaning on officials. so, look, all i want to do is this i just want to find, ah, 11,780
reporter: his cabinet members and his own family. i made it clear, i did not agree with the idea of saying the election was stolen and putting out this stuff, which i told the president was bull [ bleep ]. i expect attorney general barr, so i accepted what was saying. reporter: all describing what happened in their own words, and making it clear that right from the beginning, donald trump was told the truth i thought, if he believes this stuff, he has, you know, lost contact with he s become detached from reality. reporter: but donald trump was so adamant about staying in power, the committee showed he would try to overturn the election only way we re going to lose this election is if the election is rigged remember that. he tried to do it through lawsuits 61 cases lost, half thrown out n. no instance did a court find that the charges of fraud were
but in the other, there was discussion of the merits that was contained in a complaint. in no instance did a court find that the charges of fraud were real. it is also worth noting that even if the trump campaign complained that it did not have its day in court, there have been post-election reviews in each of the six battleground states that could have made a difference. those ranged from the somewhat farcical cyber ninjas case in arizona to the michigan senate report that was mentioned earlier, the hand recount in georgia, the mr. pak address. in each one of those instances, there was no credible evidence of fraud produced by the trump campaign or his supporters. thank you. as mr. ginsburg has explained, there are no cases where the trump campaign was able to convince the court that there was widespread fraud or
victory, which actually did not affect the outcome for either candidate. despite those 61 losses, president trump and his allies claimed that the courts refuse to hear them out, and as a result they never had their day in court. mr. ginsburg, what do you say about the claims that mr. trump wasn t given an opportunity to provide the evidence they have of voter fraud? today have their day in court? they did have their day in court. about half of those cases you mentioned were dismissed at the procedural stage for a lack of standing, the proper people didn t bring the case, where there wasn t sufficient evidence and it got dismissed on a motion to dismiss. in the other, there were discussions of the merits contained in the complaint, and in no instance did a court find that the charges of fraud were real.
On Tuesday, November 30, 2021, the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction, enjoining the CMS vaccination mandate effective.