seen, this is certainly a creative effort by the prosecution, at least, to try to get to the problem of the opioid prop, crisis dana: was there a different law, a different avenue they could have used? i think that if this fails on a public nuisance theory, they are going to revert back to more traditional court claims, such as negligence. if you compare and contrast with the tobacco issue, consider that tobacco does not have any legitimate medical use. on the other hand, opiates do. they have been authorized for prescription roosts. dana: and they have helped a lot of people. they do help a lot of people who are dealing with pain.