out at the court by real. in strikes as a rough future. it s what these folk are actually hired to do and reminds me a little of the mcconnell option, although granted that may heb get us over the hump but a great way to keep your fingerprints off something if want to. this completely takes the government s ability to implement countercyclical economic policy. so the economic hits a recession, we re obviously still struggle wig the last one, automatic stabilizers kick in pshgs help for medical coverage. food and nutrition for family. that stuff would absolutely not be allowed under a balanced budget amendment, because revenues are sage. you mentioned, the stable irzs that help the economy get back on track. yeah. that seems like a huge problem. the other thing is does, makes it very attractive to spend
what it would do, seems to be the mother of all judicial activism, shunt it over to the courts. the court won t want to raise taxes and the supreme court will cut spending and tell us by how much and depending how it worked out at the court by real. in strikes as a rough future. it s what these folk are actually hired to do and reminds me a little of the mcconnell option, although granted that may heb get us over the hump but a great way to keep your fingerprints off something if want to. this completely takes the government s ability to implement countercyclical economic policy. so the economic hits a recession, we re obviously still struggle wig the last one, automatic stabilizers kick in pshgs help for medical coverage. food and nutrition for family. that stuff would absolutely not be allowed under a balanced