With a coronavirus pandemic continues to unfold with cases now topping 3700000 with 260000 reported deaths now here in the u. S. There is more than 1000000 cases and 7071000 deaths as the number of infections are decreasing in some states others havent even reached their peak yet still more than half of the country is easing restrictions but over in california an interesting phenomenon is taking place as its Homeless Population takes advantage of the strain airflight travel and begin to set up tent at the airport arties attash a suite has those details from l. A. X. One of the busiest airports in the country is nearly empty and flights are limited with travel restrictions in place some are utilizing l. A. X. As a place to call home for at the time being. Airports like l. A. X. See less travelers in los angeles theyre now seen more homeless and some say they believe the emptier airports are safe place to be right now making it easier to social distance then on the streets according to l
Speech. The other point i would add is that even the clearly identified , i think theerseas government would concede they have First Amendment rights when they act here in the United States as they often do when they come here for meetings or to publish papers or participate in conferences and of the problem with the pledge requirement is that it binds these organizations forever and for all purposes. Justice breyer . It seems to me the government is prepared to concede that you, care usa, does not have to oppose prostitution. But they say the First Amendment does not prevent them from telling care india that it has to oppose. So why dont you simply write a grants to get all the money yourself and give it to care india . That, yourlem with honor, is that according to the government the policy requirement still binds the u. S. Organization in the following way. If care u. S. Gets the money and some grants to care india, it must carry the burden of the government in imposing the policy r
What we have just heard. The National Constitution center is a private nonprofit with an Inspiring Mission from congress, to disseminate information about the u. S. Constitution on a nonpartisan basis in order to increase awareness and understanding of the constitution among the american people. That is just what we are trying to do as we Learn Together during these important arguments. Joining us to learn and to help understand the arguments we have just heard are two of americas leading advocates and scholars of the constitution, both of whom have filed briefs, called amicus briefs, on different sides of the case. Walter weber filed a brief in support of the petitioners, who are known as u. S. A id, and the case is usaid versus the alliance for open society international. He is senior counsel for the American Center for law and justice in washington, d. C. , which is the organization on whose behalf he filed a brief. He has written many briefs in landmark cases of the supreme aclj an
Other 48 bookstores in book row shutteredded. The store was then passed on to my late father, fred bass, who grew the store to a scale and popularity he never thought was possible. Now im the owner, and some critics said as a woman its hard, going to be hard to run the store, and id get wiped out by, in this digital age. Right, ha. [laughter] so i want to thank you and the book Loving Community in this audience for helping us not only survive are, but thrive through the agings. [applause] so its impossible to realize tonights book, watergate girl, without drawing parallels to todays headlines. At the crossroads of the watergate scandal and womans d the Womans Movement stood a lawyer barely 30 years old and the only woman on the team that prosecuted the highest ranking white house official. Amidst a failing marriage, having her house robbed and her privacy invaded, he fought to receive the. Respect afforded her male counterpartses. Tonights author, Jill Winebanks, is an msnbc analyst wh
Lawyers there is incidentally case law which says that the physical layout of the courtroom can have bearing on whether a trial is fair or not so for our all or his protests about that have been disregarded but beyond this i am becoming worried by the trend of some of the legal arguments in the very interesting lee the prosecution seems to have accepted i should say the crown seems have accepted that the things that he has been charged with are political offenses but the argument now seems to be that that isnt relevant at all in extraditing him because the u. K. Extradition act of 2003 doesnt say that people cant be extradited on police for political offenses even though there has always been well understood. Even though the extradition treaty with the United States. Precluded and that does worry me that worries me a great do well it should worry us all because Julian Assange has a journalist ok i mean the way hes being treated me go to jail or here also in london the way hes being tre