As person having being before the Honorable Supreme Court of the United States are to draw near and give their attention. The special history series, produced in partnership with the National Constitution center. Exploring the human stories, and constitutional dramas behind 12 historic [ decisions. Mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court quite obvious in much of our most famous decisions are the ones that the court took that were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of different people who helped stick together, because they believe in a rule of law. Good evening. Welcome to cspans landmark cases. This 1969 case of the warren Court Unanimously handed down with you most expansive interpretations ever of our First Amendment guarantees to fry speech and assembly. What are the very basics . Vandenberg was the leader of the ku klux klan in cincinnati, ohio, who held a rally for his members of hi
Public service and brought to you today by your television provider. All persons having business before the Honorable Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to draw near and give their attention. Landmark cases. Cspans special history series produced in partnership with the National Constitution center. Exploring the human stories and constitutional dramas behind 12 historic Supreme Court decisions. Mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court. Quite often in many of our most famous decisions are ones that the court took that were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of different people who help stick together because they believe in a rule of law. Good evening welcome to cspans landmark cases. Tonight brandenburg versus ohio this 1969 case the warren Court Unanimously handed down one of the most expansive interpretations ever of our First Amendment guarantees to free speech and assem
Good evening and welcome to cspan landmark cases, tonight bundaberg versus ohio. Which was unanimously handed down to free speech and assembly, one of the very basics of this case . Brendan burke was the leader of the ku klux klan and ohio, who held a rally for his small group of members and he they filmed, it unaired it on tv. Showing him in a hood, clan regalia in front of a burning cross. Or brandishing guns and making racist statements about the jews and blacks. And he was committed, and sentenced wanted ten years under ohio statute. As a crime to advocate violence. Were going to dig into the particulars of this case, and learn about its impact in our society. But as we get started we have two pieces of media for you, we are going to listen to a little bit of the oral argument in the case, and you will hear some of the particulars of this case, im pleased to notice that includes some of the offensive language, used by the defendant in this case. But its part of what we are talking
It is hard for us with so many blocks in our path but were hardworking moms. Reporter misty cross is one of six defendants that lives inside. She works three jobs. Her codefendant Domonique Walker also works multiple jobs and shared what she would tell the judge if she had a chance. I would talk about the programs that are put in place to help that dont help. I would tell the court about all of the application that i filled out, the application fees, the credit check fees that land nowhere. After the hearing, the judge decided to take this case into consideration. For us that creates a lot of hopefulness in terms of his future decision. Reporter Wedgewood Properties say trespassers do whose have the right to property but they have they have the right for adequate housing. While it is sympathetic to the blight of homelessness, it does not respect nor does it condone the theft of its home. If the women move out, they hope to sell the three bedroom street to a firsttime buyer and share pr
Questions. They showcase the different standard between how we treat heads of corporations versus heads of government agencies. They should be held to similar standards but government gets a free pass, and 2001, there was a ceo of a very big energy company, a company youll recall called enron, enron filed for one of the biggest bankruptcies in history thanks to accounting sham. The ceo who wiggled his way out of trouble by saying he was unaware of fraudulent activity of his company. His name was jeffrey, and 2006 he was sentenced to 24 years in federal prison because his subordinates falsified accounting records. His excuse, he was not aware, watch. I did not believe the company was in financial peril and i have no knowledge of any wrongdoing of the employee. Does that sound familiar . I was wrong, i was overconfident in the procedures that the fbi and justice had built over 20 years. I thought they were robust enough, its incredibly hard to get a fisa and real sloppiness. 17 things th