this case. in that context, giuliani has a couple problems here. the first one is, juries don t like lawyers. plain and simple. they barely like us when we re standing up in front of them arguing. they definitely don t like us when we are on trial. the only thing they like less than lawyers are liars. by the time this case gets charred trial, there s going to be any number of things that can be used to impeach giuliani based on his credibility, his ability to testify truthfully. now, the laws a game of nerves. add to that, we start talking about him selling pardons, we re not just talking about how that comes up in the context of the courtroom at this case. it may be tried on. it also means that lots of people have a vested interest in preventing him from talking and preparing this case from moving forward. which means there s going to be pressure on him to resolve it sooner rather than later. katie, dunfee s lawsuit comes right after the verdict in the e. jean carroll case, which ru
sentenced to prison for fraud how solid you think this particular charge is going to be? that s difficult to answer charles until we hear more from these people. but let me make this clear. we have to talk about this in two separate contexts. the specific context in terms of what it means legally, but then we also have to talk about it in the context of what this means in the overall makeup of this case. in that context, giuliani has a couple problems here. the first one is, juries don t like lawyers. plain and simple. they barely like us when we re standing up in front of them arguing. they definitely don t like us when we are on trial. the only thing they like less than lawyers are liars. by the time this case gets charred trial, there s going to be any number of things that can be used to impeach giuliani based on his credibility, his ability to testify truthfully. now, the laws a game of nerves. add to that, we start talking about him selling pardons, we re not just talking abo
there s a couple problems with what he has to say. 1 he says that democracy is dead and i can t voice my opinion. yes.down can in an orderly fashion. you can t lead what they describe as an insurrection, the democrats favorite word, and go down there with a blow horn and completely disrupt the body. if you want to be an activist, trace, be an activist. if you want to be someone that s a disrupter, go be a disrupter. but if you want to be an elected official, act like an elected official and actually use decorum. he knew the rules, he knew he was breaking these rules. flown 1 s is petsing him, no 1 s silencing him, you can go out on the capitol steps in nashville and you can lead protest as an elected official. what you can t do is decide to totally take over the actual house. you can t do that. they knew this. they planned it. they organized it and now they re having to realize that there are real groin rules and
preparing for work but i assume it is against us is that of wrong assumption? while it is not against belgium and luxembourg. look, i think the bottom line is where in conflict and we need to start talking about it that way. most of the people who are up you now do not remember now is very young obvious at the end of the cold war but it s been about 30 years if there was another superpower in the earth and those in conflict with united states. and we are back in their place and we need to stop attending that s not the case i hope this never an armed conflict but it s a conflict in at every level you can imagine. we have a couple problems because number one the biden administration is filled with a bunch of traditional or conventional political figures that grew up over the last 20 years talking about cooperating which i know we saw how that was working out. it took our jobs and our factories they got rich without poured their middle class grew in trunk and they make things and we don