lends credibility to a policy that you might not agree with. all i can say is, yes, that is a risk, but there were occasions where we overtly, at the podium, disagreed on the evidence that was underlying, or at least explain to the evidence that underlay a decision. so, for example, in the move of the two metre rule to a lower figure, example, in the move of the two metre rule to a lowerfigure, i was clear on the podium that two metres is safer than one metre, full stop. it does not mean it is unreasonable to make a policy decision to move, but the evidence base was clear. so thatis but the evidence base was clear. so that is a rather long answer to your question, because i do not know whether, ultimately, it is the right or wrong thing for us to have been there. i think it is something worth looking at. my gut feeling is it was probably overall beneficial for us to be there. probably overall beneficial for us to be there- probably overall beneficial for us to be there. , .
Advice
Role
Setting-policy
Government
Blurring
Economists
Line
Well
Lot
Others
Side
Terms
undercut the honest and nonpartisan county of, ballots represents, presents, rather democrats with two options, act uncompromisingly, at the national level. to ensure democracy everywhere, or accept that many states in our union, will, and important ways, cease to be democratic. ashley, is there evidence that this movement, the former president gave rise to, questioning the legitimacy of all elections, or they may not like the result, is that just going to become part of the permanent standing republican brand henceforth? it s certainly not going away anytime soon. this is sort of the lingering hangover, or a long shadow of former president trump, not just democrats but the system at large is really having to grapple, and while president trump was president in, office
Democracy
Options
States
Level
Ballots
Democrat
Everywhere
County-of
Act-uncompromisingly
Two
President
Ashley-parker